Next, members of the federal trade Commission Rebecca Slaughter and Christine Wilson on the agencies priorities and privacy concerns with new technologies. This event was hosted by the brookings institution. Welcome everybody here. Welcome to our cspan audience. Im cameron kerry, the distinguished visiting fellow at brookings and the center for technology and innovation. And i am pleased to continue our discussions on hashtag the privacy debate. Please feel free to live tweet on that. The federal trade commission a been very much at the center of that debate both as Congress Moves forward and as as a government, as a people deal with the policy issues of privacy. The commission has been very much in the spotlight with major cases, the Facebook Cambridge analytica settlement, youtube settlement, and a series of hearings on competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st century ear a lot of the focus on issue of data and privacy. So were fortunate to have with us today two commissioners
And the reasons why some victims choose to not move forward through the military justice process. This is about three hours. Okay. Thank you for joining us this morning. Were going to be looking at the perspectives of the services military Justice Division chiefs regarding conviction and acquittal rates, case adjudication process, and victim declination. [ inaudible ] [ inaudible ] does the article 32 statute and its implementing rule, rule for courtmartial 405, provide an effective check for charges against which there is no probable cause . Ill start with you. So, i think for the past several years the procedural requirements have change and statutory change for the requirement for the victim to testify. And as a result, in many cases that the governments most significant evidence. In the those cases where a victim chooses to not to testify, the government is basically making its case based on the paper file. And so i will say that those changes over time have, have reduced the proce
Event held by Boston University. It is about an hour and if teen minutes. Good afternoon. Im the dean hello, im dana Boston University law school, and im delighted to welcome you to our lecture. He graduated in 1976, having served as editor in chief of the Boston University law review. After clerk in for one year, he joined them where he spent the next 17 years establishing its reputation as one of the countrys leading court from lawyers. In 1993, they founded bartlett back, which is now one of the most highly respected firms in the nation. He has dedicated hundreds of cases over the course of his career, but he is perhaps most wellknown for his work as the late attorney, representing the george w. Bush campaign and bush versus gore, which ultimately determine the outcome of the 2000 president ial election. We are grateful to mr. Back for funding this lecture series and establishing the partnership, which is held by my colleague gary lawson. He is a leading scholar of administrative an
Minutes. Good afternoon. Im the dean hello, im dana Boston University law school, and im delighted to welcome you to our lecture. He graduated in 1976, having served as editor in chief of the Boston University law review. After clerk in for one year, he joined them where he spent the next 17 years establishing its reputation as one of the countrys leading court from lawyers. In 1993, they founded bartlett back, which is now one of the most highly respected firms in the nation. He has dedicated hundreds of cases over the course of his career, but he is perhaps most wellknown for his work as the late attorney, representing the george w. Bush campaign and bush versus gore, which ultimately determine the outcome of the 2000 president ial election. We are grateful to mr. Back for funding this lecture series and establishing the partnership, which is held by my colleague gary lawson. He is a leading scholar of administrative and constitutional law, and as a large last week, hes also a huge p
Trial attorneys in the nation. Mr. Beck has litigated hundreds of cases over the course of his career, but he is perhaps most wellknown for his work as the lead attorney representing the george w. Bush campaign in bush versus gore, which ultimately determined the outcome of the 2000 president ial election. We are grateful to mr. Beck for funding this lecture series and establishing the philip beck establishment, currently held by my colleague gary lawson. Professor lawson is a leading scholar of constitutional law and as i learned last week, he is also a huge billy joel fan. He twice worked for antonin scalia, once on the court of appeals for the district of columbia and once at the u. S. Supreme court. Professor lawson is also a Founding Member of the Federalist Society where he serves on the board of directors. He is also on the Editorial Advisory Board for the heritage guide to the constitution, a reference guide for legal scholars. Today professor lawson will discuss his views on w