0 can t back up her criticism and trivializes a huge problem, irresponsible spending by the federal government. two words, not good. o reilly for sure criticizes president obama. i think it is fair to stay the unsubstantiated story by the daily caller accusing menendez has been discredited but the conservative website hasn t retracted the claim. one admitted to taking money they said they had the wrong hooker and now they say three women acknowledged being paid to lie about having sex with me den nez and his office says this was a smear job. a top law enforcement official reported that a local lawyer said someone claiming to be from the daily caller offered $5,000 to find women to lie about menendez. the caller says that is not true and i find it hard to imagine but the website founded by tucker carlson says it is not independently verified the identities of the women involved in the dominican probe and remains unclear with one prostitute retracting her claim. at this point the dai
0 i think it s because we ve grown up in a different generation. let s be honest, presidents in the past have used comedy more for self-dep ra kating humor. clinton made fun of himself being chubby. bush made fun of his greatest weakness, speaking english. now you have obama turning the table a bit. he makes fun of himself, but he uses comedy like a comedian, like a weapon, it s very effective. other presidents have had some good lines of their own. here s george w. bush at the 2008 correspondents dinner poking fun at then-candidates. next year a new president will be standing up here. i have to say i m kind of surprised we don t have more presidential candidates here tonight, like any. senator mccain s not here. he probably wanted to distance himself from me a little bit. you know, he s not alone. jenna s moving out too. the two democratic candidates aren t here either. senator clinton couldn t get into the building because of sniper fire and senator obama s at church. all rig
0 in fact, you re against it. i am absolutely against a ban on same sex marriages because even if your voters because they are simply unconstitutional. and it is one thing to read the polls, which we have discussed which show again that a majority of americans are in favor of same sex marriage. but it is more important to read the constitution. and the constitution of the united states dictates, i believe, under every court precedent that we have discussed in terms of describes marriage as a fundamental right that the same sex couples that are before the united states supreme court, mrs. windsor, miss perry, be allowed to have equal protection under the laws as any americans when it comes to their ability to join themselves with their loving partners in marriage and raise their children. and 61% of californians are in favor of same sex marriage. yet the last time they voted they voted against it. so it gets kind of complicated here. because you have, you know, voters saying