the riot once it got under way. we will see them drive that point home today. thank you very much. this morning new testimony from a veteran member of far right extremist group the oath keepers admitting the group had a stockpile of weapons including an ar-15 stashed outside washington on january 6. afterwards, fbi agents were seen carting several gun cases and other evidence from the courthouse. cnn s whitney wild is live with us at the u.s. district court. she has more on. this whitney? brianna, this is quite a moment in court. what this man kerry krucummings testified to, he had not seen that stockpile of weapons like that since he was in the military. he traveled to washington with one of the defendants and brought his own ar-15 and ammunition. it was when he was here in washington that another defendant told him to return to virginia which is where that weapon stockpile was to prepare for what they called a quick reaction force. that quick reaction force has been o
if donald trump asked an employee to move boxes of documents after receiving a subpoena that included said documents, what legal questions does that raise? it raises a number of questions legal and factual. what were the documents being moved? what is just moving the documents mean? where were they being moved from and to? i know we can t take the piece ands say there is new video and testimony. i don t think we can take this and really draw legal conclusions from them. if you take the position that the trump team has taken parentally, that he declassified documents in the first place, then there is a dispute about whether the documents being moved were declassified, classified, we just don t know about it to draw any fair conclusion that s are meaningful. it may than they were under subpoena. whether or not they were classified, ultimately the search warrant in august didn t
they were responsible for building and to say where those items really were. then it turns out that about a month later, in the days just before october 1, when obviously the website tried to launch, what the company had predicted in a august didn t turn out to be true a month later. by august of 2013, just a couple of months ago, the federal taxpayers had by cgi federal about $197 million. in order to get all these ficks completed, having that many people work on this different bugs that were in healthcare.gov, do we have any idea how much more money the taxpayers have had to pay to fix it? that s a good question. $197 million hasn t all been paid, but that s the amount the federal government has promised to pay. as i understand it, the negotiations of whether there s going to be more that s owed hasn t taken place. they re working more on getting
month later, in the days just before october 1, when obviously the website tried to launch, what the company had predicted in a august didn t turn out to be true a month later. by august of 2013, just a couple of months ago, the federal taxpayers had by cgi federal about $197 million. in order to get all these ficks completed, having that many people work on this different bugs that were in healthcare.gov, do we have any idea how much more money the taxpayers have had to pay to fix it? that s a good question. $197 million hasn t all been paid, but that s the amount the federal government has promised to pay.