are also requesting and expect the other materials that i just stated. mr. chairman, you wouldn t allow the underlying witness who performed the polygraph test to testify nor would you allow mark judge to testify. i would like to point out, thank you for allowing this report in the record, but that is the reason we don t have the underlying information for you. you got what you wanted and i think you would be satisfied. when was the polygraph administered? it was administered on august 7th, 2018, and the date of the report is august 10th, 2018. when was it provided to the committee. let s see if we can do this in an order leeway. he was asking and i have it right here. september 26th. we accepted it.
but, mr. chairman, you wouldn t under allow the underg witness to testify, nor would you allow mark judge to testify. i would just like to point out, thank you for allowing this report in the record, but that is the reason that we don t have the underlying information for you. you got what you wanted, and i think you would be satisfied. i am satisfied. editor, go ahead. when was the polygraph administered it was administered on august the seventh. 2015. and it was the date of the report, august 10th 2018. when was it provided to the committee? let s just see if we can t do this in a more orderly way. he was asking, and i have it right here. you have it, as well. september 26. we have accepted it. ms. mitchell, for senator cruz. thank you.
the other materials i stated. mr. chairman, you wouldn t allow the underlying witness who performed the polygraph test to testify, nor would you allow mark judge to testify. so i would just like to point out, thank you for allowing the report in the record but that is the reason that we don t have the underlying information for you. you got what you wanted and i think you would be satisfied. i am satisfied. senator, go ahead. when was the polygraph administered? it was administered on august 7th, 2018. it was the date of the report is august 10th, 2018. what wasn t provided to the committee? let s just see if we can t do that in a more orderly way. he was asking and i have it here and you have it, as well. we ve accepted. all right. miss mitchell for senator
it s my understanding that they were in process through the national are archives, not partisan lawyers. republicans agree. 90% of elena kagan s white house records were publicly available and could be used freely by any member. by contrast, the committee has only 7% of brett kavanaugh s white house records. only 4% of those are available to the public. no centage or committee rule grants the chairman unilateral to designate documents committee confidential. so, i have no idea how that stamp committee confidential got on these documents. i sent a letter on august 10th, 2018, objecting to the blanket designation of documents as
documents were processed through the national archives, not private partisan lawyers and republicans agreed. 99% of kagan s white house records were publicly available and could be used freely by any member. by contrast, the committee has only 7% of brett kavanaugh s white house records. and only 4% of those are available to the public. no senate or committee rule grants the chairman unilateral authority to designate documents committee confidential. so i have no idea how that stamp committee confidential got on these documents. i sent a letter on august 10th, 2018, objecting to the blanket designation of documents as committee confidential.