concerns about would there be objections to the government being able to introduce into evidence at trial, that dialogue up at bedminster where trump is referring to a document, the dialogue you played at the top of the show? or would that be ruled by the court to be more prejudicial than probative since the document was not the basis for a charge? guess what, the document is now a basis for a charge. so i think any argument that that audio shouldn t be admissible is going to fail. or if it doesn t fail, if there are successful motions to suppress, those are things that government can appeal. that part of it, to me i could just hear trump thinking that, you know, he s figured it all out. and despite just by transportation, right? right. he creates the nexus that now brings it all together. which, frank, begs the question for me, what is trump thinking at this point in light of all of