Welcome to very scary people. Im donnie wahlberg. It was one of north americas most haunting and horrific crime sprees a series of rapes, abductions, and murders of young women just north of the u. S. Canadian border. After more than five years, investigators finally identified a prime suspect, a handsome, educated accountant named Paul Bernardo. Police were convinced they had the right man, but did he act alone . Heres part two of the ken and barbie killers. Man this is the story of one of the most sensational murder cases in the history of canada. It started with the scarborough rapes. Reporter since may 4, 1987, numerous Sexual Assaults have been attributed to a man dubbed the scarborough rapist. Paul hunter his m. O. Was to go up behind his victims and grab them from behind to make sure they couldnt see him. Pron he had put a knife to their throat and said, if you look at me, ill slit your throat. Kenzora and the attacks, each one got a little bit more violent as time progressed. M
reinforce or dismantle the colorado supreme court s order excluding the former president from the ballot in that state. effectively punishing trump for a crime which he has neither been criminally charged for convicted. dana: as soon as it begins we ll listen to it live. until then our fox team coverage continues. we have andy mccarthy, jonathan turley, and kerri and joining us is karl rove and andrew. one of the things i wanted to start with you on, andrew, set the stage about how unprecedented this is and what this moment could actually mean. i think it s very interesting to think about today through the lens of donald trump. the justices are thinking about what this ruling does for decades or even hundreds of years to come. this is a precedent we ve never had before. what happens when states challenge candidates for presidential office? this is not just a donald trump issue. this is every single election that will come from here on out. i don t think that the justices
this legal pressure that is engulfing donald trump to a degree he s clearly aware of. his former white house lawyer made waves and concerned people by ricking trump will go to jail over white house documents. now we have this short but unusual letter from donald trump s lawyers, signed by them, publicized by donald trump that reads like a cry for help or some sort of freakout. i can tell you straight up it s not a normal legal proceeding. it s addressed to attorney general merrick garland. the wall street journal made waves that the quays may be nearing the intend although no one can say what happened, it clearly had bad news in there at a minimum for trump with insiders bracing for a possible indictment. again, that s not news you can go to the bank with, but it s wall street journal, which is own by the murdoch empire, and that may among other things may have led trump to write this letter. it basically tries to shake down the attorney general of the united states, whic
justice patrick lesage was required to make a decision about how they would be used in court. he decided that videotapes that directly involved the victims would be shown only to the jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and the accused himself. the audio portion of those videotapes would be heard by all. there is nothing pleasant, there is nothing good in seeing, let alone just listening, to what was going on. malbon: we heard young girls being raped, hit, abused, tortured, crying out for their parents, and i remember reporters openly weeping in the courtroom. paul hunter: we watched the jurors watching the tapes, and you could see the blood draining out of their faces. van allen: paul bernardo was asked why on earth did he keep the videotapes
pron: people just wanted to know, but then when they learned the details, they were horrified. reporter: the trial provided some of the most dramatic moments in canadian courtroom history, but it was the heartbreaking videos of the victim s ordeal that set the case apart. there had not been this kind of videotape evidence offered in a trial. justice patrick lesage was required to make a decision about how they would be used in court. he decided that videotapes that directly involved the victims would be shown only to the jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and the accused himself. the audio portion of those videotapes would be heard by all. there is nothing pleasant, there is nothing good in seeing, let alone just listening, to what was going on.