heard so far that is significant? dr. nakasone is an electronics engineer and is now just giving his background and qualifications, which both sides agree is an expert in the area. now we re getting to the 911 call where someone is heard screaming in the background. let s listen to the testimony. thank you. the portion was around 45 seconds. that s from the beginning of the recording, until there was a loud noise, almost like a gunshot-like audio event. and that duration was about 45 seconds. we listened to the entire conversation exchanged between the female caller and the female 911 operator. and when i was listening to those conversations, of course,
fact checkers will be busier than a one-armed paper hanger. what i don t agree with is he did very well. if you put all that together, the way he was acting, he was like lurking around the background, he wasn t paying attention to the question. she was very engaged in all the visuals. this is not just an audio event, it s visual too. i agree with the analysis that we made so far. i don t agree with the conclusion. i really don t i m a partisan. trump doesn t convince a single person. the visuals were terrible for him. and he didn t tie this debate. i m sorry. i can t go along with the consensus there. this is in your view, how false equivalency coverage starts after a weekend dominated by, to many, disqualifying obscene videotape. a night dominated by a kind of kim jong-un style conference