taliban and left 100,000 of our allies there. imagine if we had ran away from northern france [audio difficulty] inspector generals are deep dives, that is what they are, everyone has a reason to get another example of botched rule of law, botched national security and botched the economy, it is disappointing. having spent time in afghan, for allies to be hunted down is a stain on our credibility for a
that they point to maybe this being potential ammunition for him and cause for an obstruction of justice case. explain that to me how that could be. welsh not clear well, it s not clear what they mean by obstruction the, because one of the criminal statutory provisions that they relied upon is efforts to obstruct an investigation. that could come in the form of a number of things, you know? the classification markings on the documents could have been changed. the material could have been actively hidden or falsely denied as being in the possession of people at mar-a-lago. and it can be [audio difficulty] to these document [audio difficulty] that may be what is underneath all those black lines. i mean, we learned much in the sense of confirming what had
i will continue to do everything to care for the safety and well-being of miss griner and of all u.s. citizens detained in the russian federation. i have no other comments. that care for the safety and well-being of misgriner and of all u.s. citizens detained in the russian federation, we have no higher priority. thank you. i have no further comments. difficulty there sorry for the audio difficulty. we ll clean up that audio. the wrong microphone was being played out. that was elizabeth mood, the top american diplomat in russia right now. the ambassador is no there, but i think we have at the white house, and teri jackson, i know you re standing by as well, from the wnba players association, i
while, fly in a private plane, go to a private home, have a handful of people that she talks to, but for the most part she s completely abandoned wyoming for, i guess, bigger and better things. i find that to be an interesting comment from her standpoint. the january 6th committee is clearly political. every aspect of it is political. the way we refer to it out here a kangaroo court. they ve already are described that the sole purpose is it of it is to make sure donald trump never gets near the oval office again, and i think she s trying to rewrite history in terms of what the purpose of that committee is. out here in wyoming, i am on the ground every day. we are at almost 37,000 miles driving around the state of wyoming since i announced last september. yesterday we were at a parade in rollins [audio difficulty] the public events as well as other things here in wyoming
committee. chad pergram on the phone right now on what we can expect from all of this. chad. reporter: good morning, neil. well, it only took a jury [audio difficulty] yesterday he faces two years in jail. sentencing comes in mid october. night on fox ban bannon said, quote, if i go to jail, i go to jail. now, contempt of congress convictions are rare. the last two persons found guilty were nixon torn general attorney general and watergate [inaudible] both in 1974. bannon if refused to cooperate with the committee, he hid behind a shield of executive privilege. even though bannon if had not worked for the trump administration for a couple of years before the trial. here s the problem for the committee, it still does not get the information it wanted from bannon. former trump aide peter navarro also refused to comply with a subpoena by the committee, he goes on trial in november.