in decline, and yet they go after a popular president,identa a president that they got more votes than any sittinguntr president in the history of our country by far. byand then much better the seco time in the election than the first. and they go after hi gm on a bo, his house just like the russia, russia, russia hoax and all of the others. this has been going on for seven years. thing onand they can t stop bece it s election interference aeytv the highest level. there s never been anything like what s happened. i m an innocener bee what t man. and i m an innocent person. they had the mueller hoax, the mueller report an person., t came out. no collusion after two and a half years that was set up by hillary clinton and democrat . but this is what they do.s this is what they dowhaty do so. if they would devote their energies to honesty and integrity, they would be a lot better for our country. they could do a lot better. they could do a lo.t of great oa things. now, on true so
this, how do you not how dodiatl you not look at immediatelyy begin the rifle comparison of hillary clinton and, of course, the top secret classified information on her serversd of n we re told that even they believed that foreign ve tha. ies got a hold how do you compare it to that? how do you compare itt to to documents top, secret classified documents in four locations forifie joe bides if it s an obstruction charge, e-mado you say the deletioargenf 33,000 emails and the destruction of devices with hammers is not some type of obstruction charge? and how dos isot som you how dot compare and contrast the treatment of two democrats and one republican, two systems of justice, sean, one for two donald trump and sice, sea one r everybody else, merrick garland, the attorney y general is criminalizing a civil dispute over documentsge that s governed exclusively by civil statutes, the presidential