privilege on behalf of steve bannon to stop that. and in any event, he s not president. and we have a real attorney general, not an attorney general who is just a sycophant to the president making political judgment. so i think that that was, you know, an absolutely freakish sequence of events that led to three and a half years for mcgahn. i think we re going to be able to get a ruling much, much quicker than that. okay. i don t know if you saw chris at dan scavino s, attorney on tonight. so my question is representative adam schiff saying that he didn t know if mark meadows, trump s former chief of staff is acting in good faith when it comes to engagement with the committee. are meadows along with kash patel and dan scavino, that s why i mentioned the attorneys, are they cooperating? and what can you tell us about these conversations, if anything? i m not involved in the day to day negotiations with these people, but the lawyers have told us they are engaging with the committee. s
mcgahn. i think we re going to be able to get a ruling much, much quicker than that. okay. i don t know if you saw chris at dan scavino s, attorney on tonight. so my question is representative adam schiff saying that he didn t know if mark meadows, trump s former chief of staff is acting in good faith when it comes to engagement with the committee. are meadows along with kash patel and dan scavino, that s why i mentioned the attorneys, are they cooperating? and what can you tell us about these conversations, if anything? i m not involved in the day to day negotiations with these people, but the lawyers have told us they are engaging with the committee. so they are in an explorative deliberations and discussions with them about what they will turn over and when they will testify. something that steve bannon never did. but the point at which it s clear that they re just playing games or they don t intend to participate, again, we will go back to the full panoply of sanctions we have