with author james patterson. he also asked clinton about the me too movement and whether he feels differently now about what happened with monica lewinsky looking throughs m too. no, i felt terrible then. and i came to grips with night did you ever apologize to her. no. yes. and nobody believes that i got out of that for free. i left the white house $16 million in debt. but you typically have ignored gaping facts in describing this and i bet you eent even know them. this was litigated 20 years ago. two thirds of the american people sided with me. they were not insensitive to that i had a sexual harassment policy when i was governor in the 80s. i had two women chiefs of staff when i was governor. women were overrepresented in the attney general s office in
country. he didn t speak about the verdict. he didn t tell you what the justice department is going to do because there is an open investigation that the attney general is having. what he did say is this is the context into which we ought to be having a productive conversation. by the way, as president, he also ended on an optimistic note. talking about his children and saying, look, things are better. we re not perfect, but it s better. wolf, you have been in washington a long time. you have covered a lot of presidents. did this surprise you? well, you know, i was on the air. all of a sudden someone said in my ear, the president s walking into the briefing room. i said, okay. the president s about to get personal. that was my initial he was about to finally wrap up the week with excuse me with what lot of people thought he should have done earlier in the week. but, you know, better late than never, i guess. you know, he was probably weighing whether or not to get into this
tracking dowth r, where did that c come frm? who owned that car? who tolthat car? doing all the kinds of things that we do in aditional law enforcement without anyesor to racial profiling. where is the line, . attney general? this is very complicated. ifouav u. citins beinin used going back and fth to pakistan, we a a tracng ppl om pakistan and yemen for reans that are relevant that are germane to law enforcement, not becausehey ju happen to be pakistani. where is he line when you talk about profiling? again, i don t think the profilg is good law enforcement. what you want too is see people who are going bacand rth,what, infact, are they doing? are they bringing substantial amountsf cash back d forth? what are they doinghen they over in pakistan, when they re in yemen? at are they doi inhe united states? is there a pricate, a bases for us to believe that we want to focus our law enforcement attenon on them, not on the basis of the color of their skin or the name they have, but on th
tracking dowth r, where did that c come frm? who owned that car? who tolthat car? doing all the kinds of things that we do in aditional law enforcement without anyesor to racial profiling. where is the line, . attney general? this is very complicated. ifouav u. citins beinin used going back and fth to pakistan, we a a tracng ppl om pakistan and yemen for reans that are relevant that are germane to law enforcement, not becausehey ju happen to be pakistani. where is he line when you talk about profiling? again, i don t think the profilg is good law enforcement. what you want too is see people who are going bacand rth,what, infact, are they doing? are they bringing substantial amountsf cash back d forth? what are they doinghen they over in pakistan, when they re in yemen? at are they doi inhe united states? is there a pricate, a bases for us to believe that we want to focus our law enforcement attenon on them, not on the basis of the color of their skin or the name they have, but on th