this is just words. because of the sqa marking, people down the end of the process will force teachers and schools to do it first. how on earth can young people have the confidence in the system when the first minister s words don t match reality? what douglas ross is trying to suggest happens is simply not the case. we ve already set out that the words this year based on teachers judgements. teachers arrive at those judgements by looking at the attainments, the work that the pupils have done, there s no past results or algorithms that dictate what an individual learner s grade will be. this crisis has - all the hallmarks of last year s crisis. the use of historical data i and a government refusing to listen and engage. young people across scotland have had the hardest- year of their lives. you ve had a year to develop a system that worked - and there s just days to improve the flawed process. we will look at all of this and hard lessons have been
but the scottish conservative leader said the evidence painted a different picture. once again, young people will lose out based on so they where they go to school. this is just words. because of the sqa marking, people down the end of the process will force teachers and schools to do it first. how on earth can young people have the confidence in the system when the first minister s words don t match reality? what douglas ross is trying to suggest happens is simply not the case. we ve already set out that the words this year based on teachers judgements. teachers arrive at those judgements by looking at the attainments, the work that the pupils have done, there s no past results or algorithms that dictate what an individual learner s grade will be.
isn t one of the main points of the justice systemys to effect justice? to say this was right, this was wrong, the people who committed a wrong or punished, the people the writered vindicate a question mark is not the point? why does that never happened in washington? well, i i think, tucker, you kind of hit it on the head with your opening. we don t really have justice. we have protectionon or old pretextual justice. is political and we have kind of the attainments of judicial processesia boat what is really going on underneath it all is everything is geared toward what position will be bn, say, autumn of 2020 and to be a little bit more concrete about it, i always thought with this escapade that it was carried as counterintelligence for a long time because theyte didn t havea criminal predicate to conduct an investigation. they did the criminal investigation of mainly obstruction in order to start impeachment chatter and it s not
around the justice system. isn t one of the main points of the justice system to effect justice? to say this was right, this was wrong, the people who committed a wrong or punished, the people who committed the writer vindicate a question mark is not the point? why does that never happened in washington? well, i think, tucker, you kind of hit it on the head with your opening. we don t really have justice. we have protection or old justice. is political and we have kind of the attainments of judicial processes boat what is really going on underneath it all is everything is geared toward what position will be bn, say, autumn of 2020 and to be a little bit more concrete about it, i always thought with this escapade that it was carried as counterintelligence for a long time because they didn t have a criminal predicate to conduct an investigation. they did the criminal investigation of mainly obstruction in order to start
bringing financial chops to a time when washington certainly is being heard. however, unhappily by the market. mr. from, i d begin with you as a white house insider. how concerned are you about the acting nature of all this and does it reflect a fundamental lack of interest in this president? it reflects something i think even more worse than what you said. it reflelkts an attempt to circumvent senate oversight. you have acting secretaries because you don t have anybody confirmable. you have to get a vote in the senate. it s clear before the news about mark whitaker s exaggerated athletic academic attainments that he would have a lot of trouble. you shut down senate oversight by bypassing the requirement that cabinet secretaries serve with the advice of the senate. this is becoming something i mean the chief of staff does not have to get senate confirmed, of