at at that atta on security video, his bag was screened just like everyone else s at the time. box cutter clearly visible but no one made a big deal about it. and here we are back to the future. it s crucial that somehow we stopped it so that s why i m here in washington. neil: one of the arguments you hear for doing this is that they went too far. they started, you know, between the liquids and everything else they overdid it. maybe i could see some of that but the nice thing, like you, i agree that
they suspect might have been behind the attacks in boston. could be several people. they are going to show a video. and i m wondering for the loved ones of victims in this attack, what advice you might have. oh, i don t know. it s just it s a long process. it s deficit stating. with the attacks in boston, we don t know where the next attack will be. also, with the letters coming to washington this week and senator s office in phoenix where i live now. they are trying to find holes in our security. for the administrator to suddenly decide that one week from today is a good idea to allow knives on every airplane in the united states is a terrible idea. it s a slap in the face to 9/11 victims and also to just america in general. we were all affected that day. this is not just about me and not just about 9/11
neighbors, communities, and we decided that we weren t going to back down from this challenge. we were going to turn this into something positive. and take what we could learn from it and come together as one american family. neil: do you think we we can do that? i think we are already seeing evidence of that if you look at boston and look at the tragedy and what happened, how people were helping each other immediately. people were selflessly run into the blast trying to help their neighbors. it s really something that is uniquely american. neil: it is, indeed. doctor i apologize for tight time constraints ahead of this presser. minutes away. i want to go to mike tobin right now in boston on a conference that could for the first time i guess, mike, put at least some faces behind these attacks. what do you think? that is the information we are getting from the fbi will release video. what we have heard from federal sources thus far that of all the images that have been floating ar
looking for the clutching of the bag, that white knuckle grip. looking for clothing that was mismatched for that time of year. they ll look for body language that supports them trying not to be stared at, which in essence creates a red flag, because they re trying not to be noticed. they re obviously going to be look for them take an explosive out of a bag or jacket or off their person and placing it within the area of the detonation or blast zone. they ll be looking for other people who may have been assisting in the operation, which would include surveillance to keep attention or to keep them from been able to impede the attacks, and just everything leading up to it. and so i think those are the main things i would be looking for. neil: wasn t too long talked to an expert on this, so obviously you re looking at video that includes examining
to catherine to what people in washington are staying about what s going on in boston or what we might or might not hear out of fbi officials shortly. catherine? today we heard from both the secretary of homeland security, janet napolitano, and attorney general eric holder. neither provided details on the case except to say every federal resource available is being given to boston as it is requested. we have new information on the kind of evidence being analyzed. have two tracks of the video and the still images but fox news is told there s a third track having to do with social media. basically a one-mile radius was put of the attack site 24 hours before and 24 hours afterward, and all the social media, facebook, twitter, instagram, is sucked up and analyzed. fox news said there were some