Inquiry, as you can see they are looking at some of the e mails that have been sent, lets have a listen into some of the inquiry at the moment. ~ u, into some of the inquiry at the moment into some of the inquiry at the moment. ~ u,. ,. , into some of the inquiry at the moment. ~ ,. ,. ,. , moment. We can see an email from nick wallis. Moment. We can see an email from nick wallis. The moment. We can see an email from nick wallis, the journalist, moment. We can see an email from nick wallis, the journalist, dated nick wallis, thejournalist, dated 16 december 2014. Nick wallis, the journalist, dated 16 december 2014. Nick wallis, thejournalist, dated 16 december 2014. Yes. To mark davis, 16 december 2014. Yes. To mark davis. Who 16 december 2014. Yes. To mark davis, who was 16 december 2014. Yes. To mark davis, who was essentially in charge of post offices media and communications, is that right . Yes. And mr wallace communications, is that right . Yes. And mr wallace says, communication
is safe forever and always. so, these are quite modest amendments, all eyes now on the government to see if they are going to throw the lord a bone that the bill can pass next week. d0 lord a bone that the bill can pass next week- next week. do you think we are likel to next week. do you think we are likely to see next week. do you think we are likely to see them next week. do you think we are likely to see them do next week. do you think we are likely to see them do that? - next week. do you think we are likely to see them do that? i i next week. do you think we are i likely to see them do that? i think it is probable. likely to see them do that? i think it is probable. without likely to see them do that? i think it is probable. without wishing - likely to see them do that? i think it is probable. without wishing to | it is probable. without wishing to predict what the government and the lord s will do, there are a few moving parts here, but i think it is odds on. and then