side. you re john berman and kate bolduan. this cnn news central any moment now, donald trump is set to arrive on capitol hill to rally support among republican lawmakers for his campaign at the very same time, president biden is getting get to meet with ukrainian president zelenskyy to show his support on the sidelines of the g7 summit in italy biden and zelenskyy expected to speak to reporters this morning as world leaders gathered, there are getting ready to announce a fifth the billion-dollar loan for ukraine that biden is now hoping sends a message to russia and show you some live pictures we ve seen live pictures of the ukrainian president meeting with some of the world leaders gathered there and now split-screen to donald trump he s sitting down with republican lawmakers friend and some reluctant allies behind closed doors, seen as a robertson is in italy. kristen holmes in washington. christina want to start with you. you ve been talking to trump s team and lawmaker
america s newsroom, i m dana perino and good morning. i m bill hemmer. good morning at home. hunter biden s conviction on three felony charges forcing president biden to change his plans at the last minute. he altered his plans to go to delaware and see his son and get this photo op with numerous people from the press. the president is on his way to italy to attend meetings at the g7. former house speaker kevin mccarthy and kayleigh mcenany join us soon. jakeee is here. the president has yet to speak to reporters since his son s conviction. the way the schedule is set up in italy the only time guaranteed to hear from him is at a press conference tomorrow alongside president zelenskyy and that format only obligates him to answer two questions. but with zelenskyy by his side and so much of the agenda on ukraine issues, it is possible that personal and domestic problems get less attention than foreign policy, a big goal at the g7 is finding ways to continue ukraine aid aft
throes of that addiction. two, that ag garland gave him the space and the authority to pursue and prosecute this case and three, that the united states judicial system is fair. no one in this country is above the law. everyone must be accountable for their actions. even this defendant. however, hunter biden should be no more accountable than any other citizen convicted of this same conduct. the prosecution has been and will continue to be committed to this principle. while many have said that this is a sad day for the bidens who like so many american families have grappled with the consequences of addiction, it is still a good day for the united states. that this conviction is a prime example of the way our judicial system is supposed to work. even president biden saying in a statement that he would respect the outcome of this case, repeating what he told abc news last week. will you accept the jury s outcome, their verdict, no matter what it is? yes. have you ruled
Laura Ingraham shines a spotlight on everyday Americans and examines how their lives are affected by politics at the federal, state and local level. Professional Intelligence Officer rather than saying this on msnbc or writing it in the press, he mightve gone straight to the Special Counsel and explained what his concerns were. But the problem is that its not just our own citizens who are listening john brennan, there are foreign governments and spies feelings stealing secrets on our behalf who are going to believe that john brennan and something that we dont earn their trust in our government is going to be degraded, our National Security will be impacted negatively. The second point i would make quickly is that those who signed this letter might question whether they want to be tethered to john brennan, who is really the weak link in this chain here. Hes not a credible witness. I think that those who are concerned about a Security Clearance issue and maybe feel like the cia, who held
He can express any views he was. Wants. The big mistake was not recusing himself. When he tweeted he would make sure trump doesnt become president and has an insurance policy, he could not be fair and just. By not recusing himself, he violated his position of trust. I would not go too far and blame it on the top authorities of the fbi. They didnt know. When they did know, they demoted him and took him out of the investigation. I think its a blemish, but i dont think its a fatal flaw in the investigation. I think there are deeper and more fatal flaws. Ultimately i think it was the right decision. Tucker dont those texts suggest why he didnt recuse himself . Its one thing to express a political opinion. Do i it for a leaving. Living. He was suggesting that his opinions would drive the crimmial investigation that he was conducting. Thats subversion of justice. Thats the issue. He denied under oath that in any way he was influenced by his hatred for thump in any of his professional decisio