Us. Today session is an opportunity to speak on the deterrents and signaling effect of financial sanctions, well and as many of you know well, economic u. S. Sanctions and economic tools which in general terms to those, named people or entities that should have access to the u. S. Financial system of those new people are entities to pose a threat to u. S. National security and the use of sanctions has become central to the exercise of u. S. Foreign policy and National Security over the last decade and in fact i would say, sanctions are a favorite policy tool of this administration in particular the top. The topic for todays session is also the subject of a report and i got jordan good to my left and i cowrote and we are releasing today, those of you here joining us in person will have seen that when you came in. Do not forget to take a copy, of the report includes findings of hours that came out no workshop and signaling and deterrence of sanctions and put it by the Franco Family Found
Good, okay, good morning, or afternoon, rather, and welcome to this event on u. S. Sanctions and deterrence. I am Liz Rosenberg and i direct economic programs here at the center for american securities, its a pleasure to have you here with us. Today session is an opportunity to speak on the deterrents and signaling effect of financial sanctions, well and as many of you know well, economic u. S. Sanctions and economic tools which in general terms to those, named people or entities that should have access to the u. S. Financial system of those new people are entities to pose a threat to u. S. National security and the use of sanctions has become central to the exercise of u. S. Foreign policy and National Security over the last decade and in fact i would say, sanctions are a favorite policy tool of this administration in particular the top. The topic for todays session is also the subject of a report and i got jordan good to my left and i cowrote and we are releasing today, those of you
Let us move to iran. The chairman asked for clarification on the uk position of the socalled red lines that iran has crossed. Not setapply, you did out any criteria related to weaponization. You referred to the stockpiling of uranium being high. Is not the position of the iransent thats enriched uranium is proof that iran is seeking Nuclear Weapons . They have not explained it any other way. Theirs the problem with Nuclear Program. It is impossible to explain, for purely peaceful purposes you all right. You are right. Kilogramsdred and 82 182 kilograms. There Nuclear Program cannot be explained in civilian terms for civilian purposes. Answeri take it from the can i take it, from the answer, that a large stockpile of in your reached uranium is not a red line . It only becomes a red line when , byapon ice the uranium which time it is too late. Is not the governments approach to set red lines on this issue. Think that is helpful. You do not believe you do not agree with president obama .
إربد: ورشة توعوية حول الأمن البيئي والسياحي petra.gov.jo - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from petra.gov.jo Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.