And hate speech topping free speech . I have seen many such miss statements. Just to summarize it, he says that hate speech is a physical imposition because it, languishes a psychological effect imposed physically, bringing about toxic stress, fear and distrust, which are all physical in once neurosurgery. And, it can change the brain lead to threatening action. Quote, when faith is physically in your brain, then you think hate, you feel hate, your moved to act in to carry out what you physically in your narrow system think and feel. That is the summary of what he said hate speech is not free speech. I was wondering response to that. It certainly is true that expression is very powerful and hate speech, which im going to put an air quotes because it does not have a specifically legal definition, lets a hateful, insulting speech on the basis of certain demographic characteristics, certainly can have adverse potentially, have adverse psychological and even physiological impacts. But, not
Good evening and welcome to cspan landmark cases, tonight bundaberg versus ohio. Which was unanimously handed down to free speech and assembly, one of the very basics of this case . Brendan burke was the leader of the ku klux klan and ohio, who held a rally for his small group of members and he they filmed, it unaired it on tv. Showing him in a hood, clan regalia in front of a burning cross. Or brandishing guns and making racist statements about the jews and blacks. And he was committed, and sentenced wanted ten years under ohio statute. As a crime to advocate violence. Were going to dig into the particulars of this case, and learn about its impact in our society. But as we get started we have two pieces of media for you, we are going to listen to a little bit of the oral argument in the case, and you will hear some of the particulars of this case, im pleased to notice that includes some of the offensive language, used by the defendant in this case. But its part of what we are talking
The information channel on the first continues to broadcast, time will tell the program, we are working live. In our studio, we have discussed the issue of mobilization in ukraine more than once, but each time the ukrainian authorities found a way to surprise and shock us. Now Ukrainian Military commissars have been given the right to use weapons, stun guns and handcuffs during forced mobilization. Heres what ukrainian journalists say about it. The National Guard will be able to use the means forced car stop, handcuffs and stun guns. On may 22, the Verkhovna Rada approved the corresponding bill in the first reading. The goal is to resolve issues related to the use of coercive measures by members of the National Guard, in particular the physical impact of special means, weapons, weapons and military equipment. The bill significantly simplifies the application conditions. Ukrainian propagandist. Put it, and it will work. In addition to weapons , Ukrainian Military commissars are going to
David saperstein is the state departments ambassador at large for International Religious freedom. He spoke at an event hosted by Georgetown Universitys religious freedom project here in weeksy where he highlighted the efforts of his department in providing aid and support to displaced communities escaping the threat of isis. Ladies and gentlemen, im honored to introduce to you the man who heads the american effort to advance International Religious freedom. Ambassador at large David Saperstein. Ambassador saperstein is the fourth person to hold this vitally important position which was created by the International Religious freedom act of 1998 or as we refer to it as the erfa. The erfa requires the government of the United States to advance religious freedom in its foreign policy. The ambassador and his office at the state department are the executive agents of that policy as we say stops with them. The ambassador for religious freedom is confirmed by the senate. He is the official ch
Man who heads the effort to advance international freedom, ambassador at large David Saperstein. Am bas tore saperstein is the fourth person to hold this vitally important position which was created by the International Religious freedom act of 1998 or has we refer to it, the irfa. The irfa requires the government of the United States to advance religious freedom in its foreign policy. The ambassador and his office at the state department are the executive agents of that policy. The buck as we say stops with them. The ambassador for religious freedom is confirmed by the senate. She the official charged with carrying out u. S. Policy, the one who travels the world representing the United Statess government and its people to defend those persecuted for their religious beliefs. And to advance the institutions and habits of religious freedom. Ambassador saperstein was confirmed by the senate in december 2014 and assumed his duties on january 6, 2015. Prior to becoming ambassador at large h