you know admiral mullen, do you agree with him? i certainly do, anderson, and i think most at least most senior military would also agree with them and i think most junior military would as well. they see the repercussions and the damage that these kind of weapons can exhibit on people and they re totally against i think for the most part, i won t try and speak for all of the military, but a good portion of the military says these are not weapons that should be on the streets of america. rick santorum was on the program last night and he said there s no such thing as an assault weapon and what people consider to be assault weapons are no different from other semiautomatic hunting rifles. that s not true. and senator santorum should know that. the fact of the matter is, there s a debate about what defines an assault weapon. in fact the nra was the first organization to use this term. i ve never known them as an assault weapon i. always called
weapons can exhibit on people and they re totally against i think for the most part, i won t try and speak for all of the military, but a good portion of the military says these are not weapons that should be on the streets of america. rick santorum was on the program last night and he said there s no such thing as an assault weapon and what people consider to be assault weapons are no different from other semiautomatic hunting rifles. that s not true. and senator santorum should know that. the fact of the matter is, there s a debate about what defines an assault weapon. in fact the nra was the first organization to use this term. i ve never known them as an assault weapon i. always called an m-16 or an m-4 rifle, the military version of the 16 or m-4 carbine, just that term. since i ve been in the private sector, i hear the term assault weapons and the first thing that will happen with anyone that s interested in the gun debate,