from people like secretary pompeo who clearly have answers to the questions? well the path, first and foremost, is for the people with subpoenas to stop avoiding that lawful pro sfwles bcess? but what if they don t. there s going to be a judge that s going to set is the precedent and i m going to predict the white house isn t going to like it. these are decisions frankly above my pay grade. the chairman and speaker and others will have to decide, although we ll be in the discussions today whether that game is worth the candle. whether given the overwhelming evidence that we have that the president used taxpayer funded military assistance to help him in his re-election campaign needs to be further demonstrated by the people who have even more evidence of it. you know, there s a val you too that, you bet. and i think the day is coming for all these people. i mean, ask roger stone, ask paul manafort, ask rick gates,
get into the room. i only know what i ve read about the subpoena, and i m sure we will be able to comply as we have with any such request here. harris: she mentioned that one person. what does it matter? i don t think it s that significant. with the government is looking for is whether or not then-president-elect donald trump was aware of any of this. and is there any record of foreign donations, which was not reported? if it was reported, they would know about it and go directly to the donor. because the foreign donations are unlawful. harris: can ask your question? this didn t come because robert mueller is including this in his investigation. we go that s right. harris: this is almost like legal collateral damage. this came because they can t michael cohen on income tax evasion. he said, here s what i have for you if you go easy on me. this happens all the time. what you have for us? i have cooking the books for the transition. ask rick gates. now they are trying to
president and the white house have distanced themselves from cohen as well as the allegations and the records requests with the inaugural committee, harris. harris: catherine, i took copious notes from my ex gets pretty good c. i appreciate that. harris: andrew napolitano preaching it was you! senior judicial analyst for fox news. judge, i want to get out what s at the heart of this case. the term transition team breezed more than $107 million. what does that lead to? where did it come from, and for what purposes it given? because the inaugural didn t cost $100 million. where did the rest of the money go? both were identified by afternoon. one was michael cohen, at the time he was the lawyer and fixe fixer. but the other was rick gates, the number two person in the president s campaign, and then the number two person in the transition team who pleaded guilty to bank fraud and lying to the fbi and became a witness for bob mueller.
the sake of argument as lawyers would say when they re being annoying, which is to say, i don t necessarily believe this. if the process works, putting her under oath before a government committee under the penalty of perjury, and the criminal sanction that comes with that, ask rick gates or george papadopoulos what happens when you lie and get caught before the government, that that is a higher standard than her speaking to the washington post. if she does that, that alone makes it more probative than simply speaking in public. i guess the same applies to him too, right? he will have to answer very specific questions and speaking to that body is going to be different from speaking to fox news. what i find more interesting is corker saying that there are more of us than you think there are. you keep saying there are a handful of republicans who want to hear the testimony and what he called the rebuttal. but there are more of us and we re a silent majority. that i think is somethi
crimes that are levelled at all these people, there will be state crimes. and for those people that are watching this show thinking that if they cooperate with donald trump then they obstruct the investigation and don t tell robert mueller the truth, know this, you will be tried in state court. you will most likely be convicted in a state court. and there already nobody that can pardon you from your time in jail in a ste court. so, good luck with that. all for donald trump. all for trump. good luck with that. go ahead and lie to robert mueller. and ask rick gates how that ends up for you. this does not get better. i m not doing anything but a public service for you to let you know there is no escape from justice. this is still the united states of america.