comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Asia global crossing - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Form 10-K Jaws Mustang Acquisition For: Dec 31

Form 10-K Jaws Mustang Acquisition For: Dec 31
streetinsider.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from streetinsider.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

Musk-Twitter Feud Privilege Fallout: Part I | McGuireWoods LLP

Not surprisingly, the Musk-Twitter fast-track Delaware case generated privilege issues. One predictably recognized Musk's unique role in his varied revolutionary enterprises. .

Law Governing Attorney-Client Privilege for Emails Hosted on Noncompany Servers Continues To Evolve in Delaware | Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Implications Of Two Decisions In WeWork Litigation On Attorney-Client Privilege And Corporate Governance - Corporate/Commercial Law

In two recent In re WeWork Litigation decisions, Chancellor Andre G. Bouchard of the Delaware Court of Chancery addressed attorney-client privilege in the corporate governance context. Both decisions stem from discovery disputes in lawsuits brought against SoftBank Group Corp. and its affiliated fund (collectively, SoftBank ) for SoftBank s alleged breaches of its fiduciary duties as controlling stockholder and its obligation under a Master Transaction Agreement, entered into in October 2019, to use reasonable best efforts to purchase up to $3 billion of common stock of The We Company ( WeWork ) in a tender offer. In each case, SoftBank opposed production of certain documents and communications, asserting that they were protected by

Firm s Computer Policy Doesn t Undermine Claim of Privilege Over Private Communications With Counsel | Proskauer - Minding Your Business

In re Asia Global Crossing, Ltd. held that company employees lacked a reasonable expectation of privacy when using a company laptop (in the case of Zara) or email system (in the case of Peerenboom) under applicable company computer/email policies, which, among other things, restricted use of company systems for personal purposes and warned users of the company’s ability to access their accounts. While acknowledging the similarity between the law firm’s computer/email policy and those in Peerenboom and Zara, the Supreme Court noted that the law firm’s policy invoked by Theroux had an important distinguishing factor. The computer/email policy expressed an expectation that firm “employees” would adhere to the firm’s policy on computer and email usage. This is in contrast to other policies in the firm’s policy manual which specifically stated that “they are addressed to (or include) firm partners or attorneys” or firm “personnel” more broadly, rather than f

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.