A Parallel Justice System
JAN 28, 2021
‘’During the formative eon of my academic personality, I had the penchant to accept every information read as spotless and an unchallengeable truth, until I read from another scientific journal on psychology that no research actually proves a hypothesis, and that everything we read and hear are figments of the writers mental exercises intended to gratify their own idiosyncrasies and ignorance or at best auto-biologyically articulate their being. Now, once these sentiments are put into writings, they sort of become authoritative information gaining the qualification to be exchanged as wholesome consumable facts. Even so, when these assumed facts are exchanged and shared within the cults of academia without a counter thesis they are certified by convention and become undisputable. In the face of the forces assembled and supervised by hardcore intellectual gatekeepers in a bid to maintain a theory even against a reasonable and viable opposit