Complainant U/S 138 NI Act Must Specifically Assert That Power Of Attorney Holder Has Knowledge Of Impugned Transaction: Kerala High CourtCase Title: Razak Mether v. State of Kerala and Anr.Citation:.
Supreme Court Judgments- Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881Sec 138 NI Act - Accused Relies On Income Tax Returns To Show Complainant Did Not Have Financial Capacity; Supreme Court Affirms.
Nominal Index [Citations: 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 441 - 530]Greik Xavier V Sub Inspector Of Police 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 433Vinayakumar K.R. v. State of Kerala 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 434Lalitha V Krishna Pillai.
Nominal Index [Citations: 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 433-446] Greik Xavier V Sub Inspector Of Police 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 433Vinayakumar K.R. v. State of Kerala 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 434Lalitha V Krishna Pillai.
The Kerala High Court recently laid down that a third party cannot prosecute the drawer of cheque for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Section 138 of.