paragraph 20 and page 71 which seeks to go much further than that. it talks about, it s not what the prime minister said, talks about, it s not what the prime ministersaid, it s talks about, it s not what the prime minister said, it s the interpretation given by members of this house, by the media and by the public. the former prime minister, borisjohnson cannot be held responsible for what people thought he may have meant. he should be held responsible if this report is to hold any water on what he said. i think my right honourable friend for that. of course, we. taste think my right honourable friend for that. of course, we. that. of course, we. we really must here that. of course, we. we really must here what that. of course, we. we really must here what the that. of course, we. we really must here what the honourable | that. of course, we. we really- must here what the honourable lady has to must here what the honourable lady has to say must here what the honourable lady
gathered colleagues from all around the world gathered here. let s be honest, this is one gathered here. let s be honest, this is one of gathered here. let s be honest, this is one of the gathered here. let s be honest, this is one of the most famous men on earth, is one of the most famous men on earth, from is one of the most famous men on earth, from probably one of the most famous earth, from probably one of the most famous family on earth, who has been part of famous family on earth, who has been part of one famous family on earth, who has been part of one of famous family on earth, who has been part of one of the most extraordinary political drama, familial extraordinary political drama, familial drama over the last few years familial drama over the last few years and familial drama over the last few years and there is a huge amount of interest, years and there is a huge amount of interest, partly on the principles being interest, partly on the principles
be kept private. the like personal whatsapps they should be kept private- like personal whatsapps they should be kept private. the government has coo erated be kept private. the government has c00perated fully be kept private. the government has cooperated fully with be kept private. the government has cooperated fully with the be kept private. the government has cooperated fully with the inquiry - cooperated fully with the inquiry today, handing over tens of thousands of documents and we will continue to comply of course with the law, cooperate with the inquiry. we are confident in our opposition by carefully considering next steps. there was a 4pm deadline for the government to decide what to do, then a letterfrom government to decide what to do, then a letter from the cabinet office sticking to its position. it is not handing over an redacted material. in fact, they are taking the matter to court. it said. it went on to say. so what is the crux of their argument? so what is
get it into operation, it is now the right time to be doing this. alison, let me bring right time to be doing this. alison, let me bring you right time to be doing this. alison, let me bring you back right time to be doing this. alison, let me bring you back in, - right time to be doing this. alison, let me bring you back in, isn t - let me bring you back in, isn t there a case for taking the longer view and thinking, yes, the government is looking at more onshore wind farms, the prime minister has difficulties with that at the moment, but there needs to be another option, and that you have to take a longer term view? i hear what you are saying about the builds and extra taxes that may go on to bills, but surely the long term view of british energy security and energy independence has to be taken into account? what to make of that argument? we account? what to make of that argument? account? what to make of that aruument? ~ ., , ,, argument? we don t consider sizewell c to hel
election as a de facto referendum on independence and she says if the snp and the scottish green party, the two parties who support an independence referendum, if they win more than half of the vote in scotland in the next independent, at the next general election, she will consider it a mandate for independence. there is no legal process now, is there? it is a purely political process. the argument purely political process. the argument that purely political process. the argument that the puiely political procesg, m, argument that the campaign on the manifesto for independence would get the majority and they would have a mandate, it is a political mandate, it does not have an effect on the legal position. the uk government would be entitled to say no, we will not authorise a referendum and you do not have the power to do so. and therefore, the discussion about the legitimacy of government and government by consent would continue to be a primarily a political argument. to be a pr