Could deprive around sixty million american women of access to free contraception. The Us Department of health said employers and Insurance Companies can now exempt themselves on religious or moral grounds from providing contraceptive pills and other methods of Birth Control. The bbcs peter bowesjoins me now from los angeles. Tell us more about this provision. This goes back to the 0bama era, is that correct . Yes. It goes back to 2009 when the Affordable Health act was introduced and a lot of debate at the time about this particular provision. At the end of the day it was included. 0nly religious institutions could effectively veto on that decision to supply contraceptives free of charge to women who wanted them. Now, under donald trump, that has been extended to include all employers. If they decide for their own religious or moral reasons that they do not want to supply the women they employed, essentially the fund through their whole fund to pay for contraceptives they will have th
Provision. At the end of the day it was included so that only religious institutions could effectively veto on that decision to supply contraceptives free of charge to women who wanted them. Now, under donald trump, its being extended to include all employers. So if they decide for their own religious or moral reasons that they do not want to supply the women that they employ, essentially the funds through their health funds to pay for contraceptives, they will have the right to do that. How divisive a political issue is this . Its a hugely divisive legal issue. It always has been. Of course, right now, conservatives are celebrating this. Many of those conservatives are Donald Trumps base. This is something he promised to do when he was campaigning for office, for the presidency last year. He has kept true to his promise. For all that people had expected this to happen at some point, there will be an argument, a campaign and, yes, legal action to try to get this decision overturned. At
Im duncan golestani. Donald Trumps Administration has announced new rules that could deprive around 60 million american women of access to free contraception. The Us Department of health said employers and Insurance Companies can now exempt themselves on religious or moral grounds from providing contraceptive pills and other methods of Birth Control. Earlier i got the latest from the bbcs peter bowes in los angeles. It goes back to 2009 in fact when the Affordable Health act was introduced and a lot of debate at the time about this particular provision. At the end of the day it was included so that only religious institutions could effectively veto on that decision to supply contraceptives free of charge to women who wanted them. Now, under donald trump, its being extended to include all employers. So if they decide for their own religious or moral reasons that they do not want to supply the women that they employ, essentially the funds through their health funds to pay for contracepti
Donald Trumps Administration has announced new rules that could deprive around 60 million american women of access to free contraception. The Us Department of health said employers and Insurance Companies can now exempt themselves on religious or moral grounds from providing contraceptive pills and other methods of Birth Control. Earlier, i got the latest from the bbcs peter bowes in los angeles. It goes back to 2009 when the Affordable Health act was introduced and a lot of debate at the time about this particular provision. At the end of the day, it was included so the end of the day, it was included so that only religious institutions would effectively veto on that decision to supply contraceptives free of charge to women who wanted them. Now, under donald trump, it has been extended to include all employers will stop if they decide for their own religious or moral reasons that they do not want to supply the women that they employed, essentially, the funds through the health plans t
With incarceration . And here is what my attorney told me. He said we have to to stop up pp up walking that people up the were mad hatter in start locking of the people we are scared of. Those of the people the need to be incarcerated in stop blocking a people for the petty crimes but in the state of oklahoma. We have the idea. I agree with the statement although i would say we need to look harder who we think we are afraid evanston remember the peoplewe in prison are still in prison and we all imagine what you do with the rapist in the murder . Sebelius officially committing murder is a veryy tiny percentage of the prison populate population we have seen that are of poverty and racism of hand as a result theyre not necessarily bad choices but this is mirrored throughout the globe whether we talkhat about blacks and latinos from south africa when the Aboriginal People so we should be careful around this division is far moreds. Complex. Super max is 1 dash solitary confinement driven pr