maria: it s absolutely extraordinary, sir. and i know that the word invasion comes with technical responses from the government. so are you reluctant to say it s an invasion? do you believe this is an invasion? if. so the technical reasons for it lie in the constitution. there are two parts of the u.s. constitution, article iv, section four, article her section 10. in that executive order that i issued this past week, i referenced both of those, plus i reference a provision of the texas constitution that also uses the word invasion. the purpose of using those words is it triggers certain additional ways and strategies that at states can use their powers to try to protect against actions such as this that are driven by the cartels. maria: okay, i understand. we have put up on the screen ways that you and your team in texas are defending the southern
dated 1991, that, in accordance with article iv of the charter, welcome the desire of the russian federation to be a member of this organisation. these are exactly the kind of crises the united nations was formed to stop. the world is watching now as another war in europe unfolds. the un secretary general, antonio guterres, made a last ditch appeal to russia. this is. ..the saddest moment in my tenure as secretary general of the united nations. i started this meeting of the security council addressing president putin and telling him from the bottom of my heart,
the revolution has begun. a silent revolution by the democrat party of joe biden to take over this party. you re talking about millions and millions and millions of new voters. and they will thank the democrats and biden for bringing them here. who do you think they re going to vote for? so this is trying to take over our country without firing a shot. we need every red state to send and invoke article iv, section iv of the constitution to tell the president that we are being invaded? matthew, i mean, that s the racist white replace theory that is out there. your reaction to dan patrick? well, he s my opponent, the cruel and craven dan patrick in this. i think it s so disturbing, but as you know, jonathan, incredibly dangerous. those were almost the exact same words that the mass shooter in
i think that he in fact, i know he has three or four different operations that are at his disposal that are legal, some that are in statute already. listen, if president obama can send $1.8 billion to the iranians, i can tell you, i didn t appropriate that, certainly finding a few billion dollars for border security on our southern border is something that this president can do legally and without a challenge. neil: all right. well, article iv of the constitution does give him some wide moves here. he could require the federal government to protect states that might be in danger of an invasion from these caravans but that would likely, from what legal analysts tell me, that would likely be struck down by a court and we would be back to where we are. do you anticipate that? so i don t anticipate necessarily that one being used. let s look at 10usc sections 274-284. neil: i m so glad you brought those up.
saw president clinton s january 17 paula jones deposition and heard the misleading answers that brought him to this point. and i d like you to listen to the president s deceptions for yourself. at any time, have you and monica lewinsky ever been alone together in any room in the white house? i think i testified to that earlier. i think that there is a. it is. i have no specific recollection life was so much simpler before they found that dress, wasn t it? there were four articles of impeachment that were referred from the judiciary committee to the full house. the first two articles involved perjury in front of the grand jury and in the paula jones case. article iii charged the president with obstruction of justice by trying to conceal evidence, and article iv with abusing his office by lying to congress in his answers to the 81 questions. many in congress had still been hoping for some sort of an escape hatch from the looming