Otherwise. The adaptive pathway that some are using did so many to have appeal because we live in the information act. The rapidity in which something can come to fashl approval with the Information Systems we have. It seems this would be a reasonable direction. I hope we can consider it in our legislation and we would be receptive to in the licensing. Its very much a topic of discussion. We have been involved deeply with the authorities that are looking at this as well as the Scientific Community to look at the opportunities to get robust answers from a range of approaches designed and innovative. At the time the fda has an array of tools and regulatory flexibility thanks to work in congress including the breakthrough designation. In fact our approaches are not in the sense that accelerated approval, for example, can use them in that enables us to move a product in the market place that collects data in a continuing way to then assure the final approval if it works and provides an ove
And aware of who was around him and the things that he said in the presence of certain people. There was no retaliation. We were asked if we have spoken to anyone or had been contacted by anyone but other than that there wasnt anything. Ms. Hicks . No, and not for me personally. After the story came out i didnt stick around too much longer because eric conn did start to do things so crazy like have someone call my phone so he could stock some person. I didnt stay too much longer after that. How do you know that he had someone do that . Because he had actually spoken to Administrative Law judge andrus and he had given my phone number to an employee there and she had left several messages on my phone to let me know when the employee was going to be off work so that eric could send someone to follow her. So there is no doubt he felt intimidated. Very much so. I didnt want to be an bald in it. It was bad enough that she left messages on my phone but he actually asked me to drive to her hom
more in the op ed. she goes on to write. we ll go back to that op ed but first to the phones. phoenix, arizona on our line for republicans. what should the president say on the u.s. involvement in libya on monday? caller: if he s the intelligent president i want him to tell us why we re going into libya and not the sudan and not bahrain. i think it s un:tionable to open another front when we re spending millions a day on iraq and afghanistan and 50% of our revenue goes to defense. host: the sudan would be another front, too. caller: we could help solve that with humanitarian aid. with the cost in fossil fuels, if we paid the actual cost that fossil fuels cost us, we would pay $12.50 a gallon for gasoline because these wars are about oil. what i m saying is if he s the innocent president then why doesn t he talk about intelligent president why doesn t he talk about the bahrain or sudan? he s doing it for oil just like the last just like the iraq war. and i think we need