To finding out, discover that they have not so much bound 1 down the road, a much scarier risk, our friends see us finding all sorts of things and saying yes, to all sorts of people. And agreeing to read that to the degree that we want and talk about preconditions, sounds great. Our friends are not treating this as merely cost free exercise and symbolism, our friends particularly in asia are looking at this as close allies and saying if theyre willing to toss the lines it says anything to anybody, do we really actually trust them in the way we traditionally trust americans. That means one fundamental thing, if war comes to the asiapacific will u. S. Be there and if you believe that the u. S. Will be there, it does more to deter war. The moment you start to believe that the u. S. Doesnt believe even symbolic statements, you start thinking about that much harder. In the clash between new liberal realists, has been fantastically costly for the u. S. s longterm position not because the rea
Which the great powers come in the good ones, the bad ones would be there. And if they deadlocked, they deadlocked. Couldnt go against the will of been a single permanent veto bearing on her, but it is enabled them to keep the lines within the tent rather than having them go out by an start hacking away at it from the outside. So despite these and that problems the Security Council has, this is actually fairly successful. Its quirkiness a place for the great powers come together to debate not necessarily dissolve things. To resolve some things, dont resolve others. But its actually in many respects a success story, rather than a failure. Host which nations make up the Security Council . Guest the Security Council has five permanent members and decided that tours of world war ii. The other criticism of the Security Council that they think is very well taken a seaside members no longer represent the population of the world. They dont represent the geographical distribution and increasing
A percentage report they have to allow witnesses to be called in to testify on both sides as far as what the sentence should be. The family of miss steenkamp they had testify the impact of her death, how it impacted them and their views on Oscar Pistorius and what they believe the sentence should be. It can be anywhere from two to eight weeks is my estimate. This is going to continue on and on regardless of what the charges are. Well be watching this trial for the next two, three, possibly four months absolutely, then the appeals process begins so this may carry on for a couple years. What about the family, what about the Steenkamp Family . What do they have within their power even if its culpable homicide, is that something they can go after him on a civil charge or is that negated because of a charge that would come down in. Oh no. The criminal charge makes a civil litigation case much better, because a persons been convicted at a higher level of sorry, are you ready . Were going to