is my understanding there is a lot of talks about putting that into the speech. and that it was a question, do you use that language of 1967 because a lot of people will have a big problem to it. and frankly when the president started off this speech, i don t think he intended to have this be the major topic of 1967. that was the intent of his speech. i want to move on to something else here. again this is one that is never ending, as we know. we will continue with this tomorrow. there is so much news specifically that the bail posted for the accused rapist in charge of the imf, million posted cash 5 million bond, hand over travel documents, house arrest in new york with video surveillance, armed guard and electronic surveillance. at the end of the day, the interesting thing, is the cognitive disdense between the french and who are inclined to
lapiere, i my stomach turns. the nr ab they call a press conference because they have been quiet and they call for more guns and redend if use of the gun that the kid used. it s true. armed guard would be helpful in the schools. average $50,000 per school. that is lots and lots of greg: we spend that money in other countrys. i would rather have it spent here. i m glad you say you agree because that was the central question of this whole thing. if there was an armed security there at the school, would it allow for possibility of lived saves. there question. no question. the media is grateful there was a protest because that allows the focus instead on that. rather than the actual message which is that the gun-free zones are the best place to kill people. e-ticket for maniacs. time we open up our eyes and say let the schools accept the idea of a shield. if they don t want the shield, the parents can decide what