I want to make a point here, and then move on to a broader one. Some years ago i went through an exercise of what is congress obligated to do under article iii . This has to go back to the 18 or do wonder a Federal District that were polished by congress and happened to read through all that debate and to begin to ask this question, but we are obligated to do is produce a Supreme Court of the United States. We could conceivably abolish all of the Federal Districts and the only thing left would be the Supreme Court and the own obligation we have there since it calls for a chief justice is to have a chief justice but we dont have to fund the building or its death. He could be at his own card table with his own candle. Thats what congress is obligated to do. So i would suggest that article iii is pretty limited if congress decides to assert its power and authority. If nothing else the workload would stack up on chief robert. That was an exercise in constitutional discussion more or less m
I am ok with the president making a goodfaith belief. Im ok with that. I think the fact here is one of bad faith. The reason why the president s statement is relevant is not the political theater. It is a statement he says he was asked, and he said no. The Justice Department said, this cant happen. Suddenly, you lose up already. I think it is bad faith. We are in uncharted waters. You will find that theres not much written on the take care clause. That is why the separation of powers trumps the Immigration Law when it goes too far. These provisions grant discretion, but to grant the amount of discretion now is unconstitutional. I should add that the memo does not put that much weight on these supervision, but the doj did. They shifted position of these provisions to put more weight on it. There is discretion but it is within the take care clause, which we have to litigate, and it will be at the fifth circuit any minute. Rep. Poe i want to reclaim my time. I didnt ask you to tell me how
ABD başkenti Washington’da temaslarda bulunan Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi (TBMM) Dışişleri Komisyonu Başkanı Ak Parti İstanbul Milletvekili Akif Çağatay Kılıç, Amerikalı siyasetçilerle yaptıkları görüşmelerde iki ülke yetkililerinin daha sık görüşmesi gerektiği konusunda mutabık olduklarını söyledi.
Türk heyetinden önemli görüşmeler! ABD ile mutabık kaldık
Türk heyetinden önemli görüşmeler! ABD ile mutabık kaldık
ABD başkenti Washington da temaslarda bulunan Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi (TBMM) Dışişleri Komisyonu Başkanı AK Parti İstanbul Milletvekili Akif Çağatay Kılıç, Amerikalı siyasetçilerle yaptıkları görüşmelerde iki ülke yetkililerinin daha sık görüşmesi gerektiği konusunda mutabık olduklarını söyledi.
AA26 Haziran 2021 Cumartesi 07:32 - Güncelleme: 26 Haziran 2021 Cumartesi 07:32
Kılıç ve beraberindeki komisyon üyeleri CHP İstanbul Milletvekili Oğuz Kaan Salıcı, MHP Erzurum Milletvekili Kamil Aydın ve İyi Parti Bursa Milletvekili Ahmet Kamil Erozan beş günlük Washington temaslarının ardından Türkiye nin Washington Büyükelçiliğinde Türk gazetecilerle bir araya geldi.
TBMM Dışişleri Komisyonu heyeti Washington temaslarında Türk-Amerikan ilişkilerini masaya yatırdı ogunhaber.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from ogunhaber.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.