After six days of testimony from judges, elected officials, voters, a redistricting expert and competing elections experts, the decision of whether to significantly change how Arkansas elects judges to its highest courts rests with U.S. District Judge James M. Moody.
After six days of testimony from judges, elected officials, voters, a redistricting expert and competing elections experts, the decision of whether to significantly change how Arkansas elects judges to its highest courts rests with U.S. District Judge James M. Moody.
After six days of testimony from judges, elected officials, voters, a redistricting expert and competing elections experts, the decision of whether to significantly change how Arkansas elects judges to its highest courts rests with U.S. District Judge James M. Moody.
Witnesses testified Tuesday about the impacts of voting laws and the judicial system on Black Arkansans, in the second day of trial in a judicial districting lawsuit that could force the creation of a single majority-minority district for electing justices of the Arkansas Supreme Court and two majority-minority districts for electing state Court of Appeals judges.
Witnesses testified Tuesday about the impacts of voting laws and the judicial system on Black Arkansans, in the second day of trial in a judicial districting lawsuit that could force the creation of a single majority-minority district for electing justices of the Arkansas Supreme Court and two majority-minority districts for electing state Court of Appeals judges.