absentee ballots left accounts. shannon, there will be an increased police presence for the macy s fireworks show this fourth of july, that includes metal detectors and undercover officers. shannon: thank you so much. the supreme court has ramped up its tumultuous term with a pair of six taken three decisions tonight. and in arizona voting rights case, the justices considered two state provisions, one that discards voters ballots if they cost them in the wrong precinct, the other when they turn in someone else s ballot. the justices upheld both provisions along ideological lines. from the majority opinion under our form of government, legislators have a duty to exercise their judgment and to represent their constituents. it s insulting to suggest they are near dupes or tools. president biden says he s deeply disappointed that the ruling, and justice taken did not hold back in her lengthy dissent.
going to be combustible. now the thing is we don t know exactly what s going on because britney didn t file a formal motion requesting this hearing. so there s kind of a big cloud of uncertainty. mike: chicago attorney andrew weighing in ahead of singer britney spears highly anticipated testimony in her conservatorship case as the mega star plans to remove financial control given to her father jamie in the wake of her public breakdown. wednesday s hearing will be spears first timesharing her tir story. joining us constitutional accountability president and constitutional attorney, welcome to both of you. thanks for having us. thank you, mike. let s start with arizona voting rights case, whether arizona is
religious liberty case. philadelphia froze the contract of a catholic foster care agency because the agency refused to work with same sex couples as potential parents. the agency turned around and sued and said that s a violation of our free exercise rights. this court has already the conservative court moved the court to the right when it comes to religious liberty. we ll see how far they go to talk about what the government can do to limit laws that impinge on religious freedom. then there s an interesting voting right case, a lower court struck down two provisions of arizona voting rights law saying that they violated the historic voting rights act. remember the court in past years gutted one provision of the voting rights act, chief justice john roberts. all eyes are on the justices to see if they re going to further limit this law and of course it comes when republican-led states are moving very aggressively to push more voting restriction