Nominal Index [Citation 379- 393]Khairunisa Sheikh Chand v. Chandrashekhar Daulatrao Chincholkar & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 379Asha Shivaji More v. State of Maharashtra and Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Bom).
Maharashtra govt sought dismissal of PIL challenging ex Governor s decision in MVA govt thehindu.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from thehindu.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Taking a stern view on the bad condition of roads across the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR), the Bombay High Court (HC) directed commissioners of six municipal corporations to file a detailed reply stating the steps taken by them on the HC s 2018 judgement. The bench also issued directions to conduct a joint inspection of manholes in all wards of BrihanMumbai Municipal Corp (BMC) by ward officers accompanied by the court-appointed commissioners (lawyers).
The Bombay high court has stated that the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) needs a more serious deterrent against those who cause damage to roads and footpaths while setting up pandals during festivals. The court was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by Prameya Foundation, which argued that the rule of forfeiting security deposits for violation of pandal permission was ineffective. The court has directed the BMC to take a decision on the matter within six weeks. | Mumbai news
Nominal Index [Citation 1 – 313]World Phone Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. v. One OTT Intertainment Ltd. In Centre 2023 LiveLaw (Bom) 1Lt. Col. Prasad Purohit v. National Investigation Agency 2023.