when and where of when both fani willis s case, and jack smith s election interference cases. right, those are sort of the twin pillars of election interference litigation or not facing donald trump. how those cases are going to be tried. and so on one hand, you ve got judge tanya chutkan, who didn t speak about in your introduction. she is largely expected to set a trial date for jack smith s election interference case tomorrow. and simultaneously, you ve got mark meadows, at a federal district court in georgia, arguing as to why fani willis shouldn t be able to her rico case against him, and 18 other codefendants, in state court. but rather, should be in federal court. i should note that hearing tomorrow, even though congressman raskin is right that overall, president trump and his allies would like to be in federal court, given that they stack them with their allies and federal society cronies. the hearing tomorrow is before an obama nominee, named steve jones. and it will be inte
like shawn still, i m going to take away from that, it s not likely to go that well for me. and, if my resources are constrained, maybe i withdraw my notice of removal, and just decide to sort of concentrate my efforts on the georgia state courts, if mark meadows loses tomorrow. matt, i don t know if you heard me trip multiple times on the word case. because the word campaign is so high on my mind, as these things are happening in tandem. you have the trump campaign. it says it has raised more than $7 million since he was booked at the fulton county jail. it is profiting off of the mugshot. they are selling everything from t-shirts, to beer i mean it just goes back to the question when i talk about all the time. they are not leaning away, mapped out, they are leading in. no i actually think it s apropos that you conflated case and the campaign. because donald trump treats the cases like they are a campaign. so in reality, they are a campaign. i have always thought donald trump wi
georgia will shape the trajectory of fulton county d.a. fani willis s 2020 presidential election interference case. sort of secretary of state brad raffensperger, set to testify at the hearing, centered around donald trump s indicted co defendant, mark meadows. meadows back infamous phone call between donald trump, and raffensperger. in which the former president told him to, quote, find enough votes in the state to overturn president biden s election victory. meadows is fighting to move his case to federal court, since he is charged with actions he made while serving as trump s white house chief of staff. today, on cnn, former trump impeachment manager had this critique of the legal strategy. obviously, after four years of packing the courts with federalist society bloggers, someone like mark meadows is going to feel a lot more comfortable in federal court. there is a political irony
motion, that mark meadows has made. let me ask you, if you are the other codefendant, what is it you are watching for tomorrow? and how does that potentially, if you are the legal team of one of those codefendants, reshape your approach to the initial stages of this case? so, there are a couple of other people who have also moved for removal. but to the extent that any of them have a good argument, i think mark meadows has a better argument than just about any of them. i don t want to say that it s a great argument, but it s definitely not a frivolous one. he essentially has to demonstrate that he was acting, either as a federal officer, or undercover of law. and, that his case presents a question of federal law. and in meadows s case, what he s going to argue is that all of the things that he word was doing with sort of endemic to his role as the white house chief of staff. so if tomorrow s arguments don t go well for mark meadows, if i m john eastman s lawyer for example, for fay