these bombs today exploding feet from the iranian general s tomb. the questions still tonight is who did it. i m kaitlan collins, and this is the source. tonight, donald trump has officially filed that appeal to overturn last month s explosive ruling from colorado s high court that declared he was ineligible to appear on the state s primary ballot, determining that he had engaged in an insurrection. the new appeal tonight is only raising new pressure on the nine justices that you see here to settle this matter once and for all or potentially risk chaos in a presidential election year. with similar battles over the ballot and trump bubbling up in other states as well, we re left with a key question tonight, can the former president be disqualified from holding public office again under the constitution s insurrectionist ban, and do states get to make that decision? trump has also appealed the decision in maine that happened to remove him from its ballot. that was to the stat
ballot, determining that he had engaged in an insurrection. the new appeal tonight is only raising new pressure on the nine justices that you see here. to settle this matter once and for all, or potentially risk chaos in a presidential election year. with similar battles over the ballot and trump bubbling up in other states as well, we re left with the key question tonight. can the former president be disqualified from holding public office again under the constitution s insurrectionist ban, and do states make get to make that decision? trump is also appealed the decision in maine that have been turned move him from its ballot. that was the decision from the secretary of state last week. also the arguments in this new appealed tonight, trump and his lawyers are claiming that there are many grounds they believe her reversal, alleging that january 6th wasn t an insurrection, even if it where, that trump didn t engage in it. and the questions of presidential eligibility are rese
about half of all u.s. households have at least one coronet home and many have much more than that. because they have ammo, billions and billions of rounds of it. those are all real numbers for hardly an argument for gun control. it s an argument effect against it. ask yourself what it would required to confiscate all those guns and other ammunition entering the united states into a disarmed nation with turkmenistan or north korea. it would take a police state an end in civil war. no same person wants either one of those things. but thankfully we do not eat them. the fact that so many americans have a firearm with her and can never commit violence tells you that guns are not the problem. most people in this country can t be trusted with an ar-15, just as we can contrast it with cars, and light in and light in a car for electricity and baseball bats and insecticide and chainsaws and pruning shears and countless other objects that can easily double as weapons. on some level, al
court can determine whether someone engaged in an insurrection, and that he is above any judicial determination of what he did leading up to and on january 6th. that s just not the law, and we re confident the supreme court will reject that claim. what i m interested in part of the argument here, and this is something that we have gone round and round about when talking about this issue with legal experts, constitutional law experts, and it s an argument that is the trump legal team says here, even if the supreme court in colorado could consider challenges to trump s eligibility, that they misapplied the law because the president is not an officer of the united states and never took an oath as one, and that the presidency is not an office under the u.s. kaitlan, that argument has been raised several times. the overwhelming majority of scholars reject it, and properly so, because to give that argument effect would mean that jefferson davis, who led the
could consider challenges to trump s eligibility, but they misapplied the law because the president is not an officer of the united states and never took an oath as one, and that the presidency is not an office under the u.s.. kaitlan, that argument has been raised several times. the overwhelming majority of scholars rejected, and properly so. because to give that argument effect would mean that jefferson davis, who led the confederacy, led the civil war against the united states, could ve become its president shortly thereafter. there s no indication in historical record that that s what anyone intended. it was a broad plan playing to all those that held office and were officers, and the president was and is both. so as they point out there other parts of the constitution where it does layout offices of the united states, and it lists the presidency separately, you