counterproductive. is this the notion that somehow rushing into help, is that the introduction of cholera here, not like the story of kind of nacent america, giving smallpox blankets to indigenous people. this is not a purposeful policy, but a set of negligent accidents. is this we want to help, but can t, or something else that should make us more anxious? so often in development, the approach is not wide enough, not developed enough, not strategic. we need to make sure we have learned lessons. partners in health has learned it s a community-based intervention we should work to reinforce the public sector and the higher staff. the whole organization is run by haitians, haitian-led organization. that s the way toward. we need to look past to really complex issues and it takes
because it seems as though the system is dealing with that. had this man been arrested that night, i m sure none of us would intent marching in sanford. we can disagree without distorting and becoming disagreeable. coming up, nerdland puts all of our eggs into one easter basket. a whole new way to package the news, you want to see that. al sharpton, and emery whalen is coming back. this is $100,000.
would have killed 7,000 people. one, we never would have allow that to happen. why? it spread so quickly because people don t have access to basic rights like water, sanitation, hygiene, and health care. the people that were dying from cholera are people who were living up in the mountains and community where partners in health were working. and why they were walking to facilities, they would die, because it kills so quickly. we need to focus on the real injustice, people don t have access to clean water. so many of the ngos have left haiti or aren t working the right way. we need to reinforce the way they are working in the country. allow more agencies for the doctors. for example, couldn t have access to the general hospital right after the earthquake, because the american and the french and the cuban doctors were all fighting turf wars. that kind of thing is
people in his church in a way, you don t see the tape, but it very much relates to people s every day problems. it seems the campaign has figured out a way to use the experience or his faith as a way to communicate with normal, every day people. we just haven t seen it yet. it s amazing how far we ve gone from 1960, where john f. kennedy s challenge was to acknowledge the faith dilemma and then say this has nothing to do with what i will do as president. we can t do that anymore. a huge gap between that and the importance of religion has changed so much. but i think you re right. he has to the goal is no longer to make a speech saying this won t have any effect on what i m going to do. it has to be a speech on how will it affect what i do? it has to fold into a story about leadership. that s his story. leadership in business, leadership as governor and
people. not just on the political front, but really telling us something telling all of us something personally. it s very important. every candidate has their policies and their ideas, but in the end and they to sell themselves they have top find a way that s not always by being the person you want to have a beer, with but find a way to capture the hearts of the voter and say this is the person i want in the white house this is a big challenge and brought many big people down and also been an avenue for other can daylights to win when they weren t necessarily the person you would think would be in the white house. and it s not only just you said you don t have a beer with them. obviously, you canner never ha beer with mitt romney, because he abstains. but there are many aspects of his religion, background that could be fun, relatable, american politics sort of stories. the problem, he keeps avoiding the fact that he is even mormon. from the speech which you played a clip, he