him. that may be the case but perception he had to shoot him that is enough. the reason he didn t pound that point home is because the prosecution knows that as the losing argument for them. the law is in favor of mr. zimmerman and matter of his perception the way he found himself getting injured. gregg: did he reasonably believe, i m reading from the jury instructions to do what he did. what is interesting in florida once you invoke self-defense, it shifts the burden from the defense to the prosecution to disprove beyond a reasonable doubt self-defensive. that is where they are weak. they don t have the evidence to disprove it. they have the evidence to create a doubt and how severe were the injuries and you got this fighting issue between the medical examiner who said the cuts aren t serious and indicative of severe pockets to his head that should have required him going to an e.r., all you
toward a top of the four story building and was actually wrestled as you can see by police who were wearing repelling ropes just inches from the roof s edge. at least 32 people in all were arrested. back here at home, the question for months has been whether the imsgrags bill will ev immigration bill will see the light of day. yesterday it passed a key test. senators voted 84-15 to begin debate on the gang of eight s plan. senator tim kaine gave the first ever floor speech entirely in spanish to voice his support for the legislation. [ speaking foreign language ] this does not mean there aren t serious challenges ahead. political reports key democrats
here s what senator inhofe had to say. may be using the i word before long. you mean impeachment? yeah. this is clearly an orchestrated cover-up. do you see something in benghazi either in the handling before, during or after with the talking points that were scrubbed that the i word, the impeachment word should come up? i don t at this point i will say. but that doesn t mean that these allegations aren t serious. joe lieberman and i did a preliminary investigation into the events into the attacks on benghazi last fall. and we had a career cia agent who was the woman who first drafted the very first talking points tell us that there was no national security reason for the
he was talking not just about what happened in benghazi now, but about the e-mails afterwards and the changing of the talking points. as you know there s a hearing on the house side about benghazi. here s what senator inhofe had to say. may be using the i word before long. you mean impeachment? yeah. this is clearly an orchestrated cover-up. do you see something in benghazi either in the handling before, during or after with the talking points that were scrubbed that the i-word, the impeachment word should come up? i don t at this point i will say. but that doesn t mean that these allegations aren t serious. joe lieberman and i did a preliminary investigation into the events into the attacks on benghazi last fall. and we had a career cia agent
misleading own counter terror people. look what happened in march of 309 where the pentagon says don t use like long war or global war on terror. use overseas contingency operation. couple months later brennan says how you define a problem shapes how you address it. 2009, also. hey guys, do you know what else happened in 2009, the fbi questioned tamerlan tsarnaev. and decided that he wasn t a person of interest. what, do you think, dana the fish stinks from the head? i don t know if i would say that about our government. i do think when they used the language to use overseas contingency operation those are weasel words that the government uses to come up. translated into arabic that is they aren t serious. you don t have to worry about them coming after you the global war on terror was much more start. if you are.