constantly making people feel like they are in danger, constantly making them feel like they don t have the same rights or advantages or opportunity as other people in this country, and after they get done delivering that message and they say click here to donate so yes, what i want is for people to see that they can embrace their individual identity and it s not like these things aren t extremely important, they are. i look at my own community, the gay community, we haven t astronomical hiv rate. it s accelerated drug abuse rate and these aren t coincidences. these are the results of people constantly being fed the messages that they are not good enough, that they are in danger, that they are not wanted, that they are hated and so i want people to see, this isn t reality anymore. it doesn t have to be this way. i m sober. i just celebrated more than four years of sobriety. my life has changed the
constantly making people feel like they are in danger, constantly making them feel like they don t have the same rights or advantages or opportunity as other people in this country, and after they get done delivering that message and they say click here to donate so yes, what i want is for people to see that they can embrace their individual identity and it s not like these things aren t extremely important, they are. i look at my own community, the gay community, we haven t astronomical hiv rate. it s accelerated drug abuse rate and these aren t coincidences. these are the results of people constantly being fed the messages that they are not good enough, that they are in danger, that they are not wanted, that they are hated and so i want people to see, this isn t reality anymore. it doesn t have to be this way. i m sober. i just celebrated more than four years of sobriety. my life has changed the
election. is that a series of fantastic coincidences? my instincts as a lawyer tell me absolutely not. jason, if those aren t coincidences, the only way to find out is a real investigation. can house judiciary get involved? can house oversight get involved in this? yes, i thinks it starts with the inspector general and the 450 employees there. i think by the end of march, you will see them come out with a defennive report. that is going to be a critical piece. it was something that myself and he a elijah consumption in a bipartisan way asked and started. i hate to say this but i said it previously. i do think they need a change at the attorney general s office. i don t think that attorney general sessions is up to the job. he needs to recuse himself of all of this. it s why we have director mueller. there are deep seeded systemic problems within the department of justice that need to be rooted out. again, it s going to be people like trey gowdy and john radcliff and host of
election. is that a series of fantastic coincidences? my instincts as a lawyer tell me absolutely not. jason, if those aren t coincidences, the only way to find out is a real investigation. can house judiciary get involved? can house oversight get involved in this? yes, i thinks it starts with the inspector general and the 450 employees there. i think by the end of march, you will see them come out with a defennive report. that is going to be a critical piece. it was something that myself and he a elijah consumption in a bipartisan way asked and started. i hate to say this but i said it previously. i do think they need a change at the attorney general s office. i don t think that attorney general sessions is up to the job. he needs to recuse himself of all of this. it s why we have director mueller. there are deep seeded systemic problems within the department of justice that need to be rooted out. again, it s going to be people like trey gowdy and john radcliff and host of other p
as a legal argument or keep them from being ad missable. this is from a interview from chris christie on msnbc earlier. he deserves scrutiny, you know why, because he was involved in the transition and in meetings that call into question his role. is that just bad blood between christie and the kushners or does he have a point. no he has a point it s not js jared kushner s involvement in the transition it s that he also attended june 9th meeting that he met with sanctioned russian bankers during the time of the transition and so there s a lot of questions about the relationship jared kushner had that he did not disclose and only acknowledged once press report or our investigation were able to expose them. what you see these aren t coincidences you see family members, campaign team members and administration team members having contact with the