Can i have a motion and a second, please . Second. Aye. [laughter] Planning Commission regular hearing for thursday, december 19, 2019. I will remind members of the public that the commission does not tolerate disruptions of any kind. Please silence cell phones. I would like to take roll at this time. [roll call] we expect commissioner richards to be absent today. First on your agenda is consideration of items proposed for continuance. Items 1a and b at 2028 through 2030 leavenworth street, discretionary review proposed to continuance for january 16. Case 201700515, 1300 columbus avenue is proposed for continuance to january 16. Item 3 at 54 fourth street, conditional use authorization proposed for continuance. Item 4, 2255 judah street conditional use authorization at the time of issuance was proposed for continuance. Item 5, 1100 van ness avenue, allocation revocation is proposed for indefinite cowans. I have no other items for continuance and no speaker cards. Commissioner koppel. I
Mark onwhat the trumpet ministration is doing in the energy sector. Good morning. The count since the councils beginning to seen over and over time and again how technology is has transformed our lives and all these new challenges and new opportunities as we think about a new future for the United States. 2003 was such a period change. 17 years after our founding our councilmembers recognize that the nation stood at a particular inflection point. We needed significant change to enhance our innovation capacity that led to the pioneering work of our National Innovation initiative and now another 17 years later, here we are again. Once again finding ourselves at the precipice of transformational change area throughout the day as debra mentioned in her remarks are going to hear stories about these changes as they are foundational to our Flagship National commission on innovation and competitiveness. The commission cochaired by the Councils Board on this stage is a multiyear effort to reima
This time. [roll call] we expect commissioner richards to be absent today. First on your agenda is consideration of items proposed for continuance. Items 1a and b at 2028 through 2030 leavenworth street, discretionary review proposed to continuance for january 16. Case 201700515, 1300 columbus avenue is proposed for continuance to january 16. Item 3 at 54 fourth street, conditional use authorization proposed for continuance. Item 4, 2255 judah street conditional use authorization at the time of issuance was proposed for continuance. Item 5, 1100 van ness avenue, allocation revocation is proposed for indefinite cowans. I have no other items for continuance and no speaker cards. Commissioner koppel. Im sorry. Lets take Public Comment. Hi. Leavenworth, i want to make a note that that was one of those fake g mail accounts using my name. Someone set up a fake account using my full name, taking advantage of things i talk about here. And they also half of the staff with it. So i want to make
And we have additional staff here if needed. Do we have any Public Comment on this item . I dont have any speaker cards. Okay. With that, Public Comment is closed. Commissioner richards. I missed the first part of the presentation, are these only for a rated structures under sequa . Ceqa . We are thinking these would apply to nonHistoric Resources. They would not apply to article 10 or 11. They could apply to individual resources that are a rated resources, but they would not meet the secretary of the interior standards. We would see them as causing an impact. I think where i am going is i would have loved to have this on 450 farrell when we did the e. I. R. And it would be the facade alternative. When we looked at the mitigation and all of that, we had some liver age with the developer leverage with the developer. This is really, really good. I seen it applying to some arated structures. I am happy to see it. The question i have is if it is a Housing Project and we ask for this, will
Parking, all of those things. And so i welcome this. And i hope we do it. Thank you. Commissioner richards. So just to be clear its nothing that you just said that i would say i violently disagree with. I did meet with supervisor moore a couple weeks ago and he asked to meet with me because when i first met him i said you should take the reigns and show sacramento that we are doing something. But i said to him two weeks ago we need to be careful that if you do things that there is some type of protection that we dont do something and then all of a sudden something rolls over us and everything that we did actually was more not because now theres some new mandate out of sacramento. We spent weeks years, on the market octavia plan. We designed it, 45 feet in the middle of the block, 55 feet at the end of the block. Got 85 feet in the middle of the block now. These are the kinds of things im talking about. We got to be careful. Thats all im saying. Thank you. Let me just add one more thing