russians who defined war as politics the russians are engaged in politics russians are engaged in politics as part of. they have aims. politics as part of. they have aims, politicalaims, they have actually aims, politicalaims, they have actually stated those political aims actually stated those political aims very clearly. the neutrality of ukraine, crimea going neutrality of ukraine, crimea going to neutrality of ukraine, crimea going to russia permanently and politically, and the independence of two eastern regions, independence of two eastern regions, gdansk and the nets. days regions, gdansk and the nets. days may regions, gdansk and the nets. days may not lugansk and donetsk. they are the basis lugansk and donetsk. they are the basis for a real negotiation and for finding a diplomatic solution. i do not think diplomatic solution. i do not think there is a military solution for ukraine. are you sa in: solution for ukraine. are you saying ukraine solution for
after christmas. but the clear message people have is that it is uncertainty. families want certainty for businesses, this is absolutely crucial, especially for businesses that are already being hit by plan b measures and people making different choices about whether to go out to the parks and restaurants, for example. share whether to go out to the parks and restaurants, for example.- restaurants, for example. are you sa in: restaurants, for example. are you saying there restaurants, for example. are you saying there should restaurants, for example. are you saying there should be restaurants, for example. are you | saying there should be restrictions now, more restrictions now? i don t thinkthere s now, more restrictions now? i don t think there s any now, more restrictions now? i don t think there s any doubt now, more restrictions now? i don t think there s any doubt that - now, more restrictions now? i don t think there s any doubt that plan i now, more restrictions no
conservative. in doing it in a way where you are notjust going to be endlessly borrowing and borrowing to do that but doing it in a fi5cally sustainable way with a very conservative way to do it. put taxes u i conservative way to do it. put taxes u- to ia conservative way to do it. put taxes up to pay for conservative way to do it. put taxes up to pay for what conservative way to do it. put taxes up to pay for what you conservative way to do it. put taxes up to pay for what you spend? - conservative way to do it. put taxes up to pay for what you spend? butl up to pay for what you spend? but another up to pay for what you spend? iei,ii another way could have been to say we re just going to keep borrowing this money if we are, borrow 12 billion a yearfor an this money if we are, borrow 12 billion a year for an indefinite period and that is. that is not fi5cally period and that is. that is not fiscally responsible, it is not a conservative value to do it that way. looking after the el
next. there is criticism about a void of policies and i think that s been evident through this by election also. we need to be talking about transformative vision for the country, putting policies out there that will make meaningful change to working people notjust in batley and spen but across the country so we don t need to get ourselves, we cannot portray this as a massive victory, we squeaked it over the line and there are still serious concerns at. share over the line and there are still serious concerns at. . .- serious concerns at. are you sa in: serious concerns at. are you saying a serious concerns at. .. are you saying a labour serious concerns at. are you saying a labour party - serious concerns at. are you saying a labour party under i serious concerns at. are you | saying a labour party under the leadership ofjeremy corbyn would have had a more resounding victory, he suffered a catastrophic defeat at the polls? the he suffered a catastrophic defeat at the olls? ., , .,
they said countries could see fresh lockdowns if people in developing nations are not vaccinated at a faster rate. herejoining me is rob yates, executive director of the centre for universal health at chatham house. thank you very much for your time. really, this appeal is to the richer countries sense of self interest? news no totally. and it isjust astonishing that we have got to this point and this isn t happening already. since the g7 leaders met in february, 1 million people have died of covid and they ve done practically nothing. and likewise the 620 practically nothing. and likewise the g20 leaders have done very little, too. so, as your previous piece said, the emergency is now, and all these falls are ramping up the pressure for the g7 to do something properly now. fire the pressure for the g7 to do something properly now. are you sa in: something properly now. are you saying that something properly now. are you saying that all something properly now. are you saying that