Forward that will be voted on accepted 2. And a second reading on september 2nd so the motion to support in with recommendation well take that without objection. And madam clerk, any other business before this committee . Theres no further business. Then we are adjourned. It is 1 15. This is a regular meeting of august 19, 2014 on the commission on Community Investment and infrastructure. Please call the roll. Thank you. The first order is business is item number, roll call. Commissionerman. Yes. Commissioner sink. Commissioner rosales. Yes. All commission ers are present. The next regularly scheduled business meeting will be held on september on city hall, 416. Announcement of sound producing devices during the meeting. The ringing and use of sound producing devices are prohibited at this meeting. Please be advised the chair may order the removal from the meeting room of any person responsible for the ringing of or use of cell phone, pagers or other similar sound producing electronic
The wood, to prevent wood earth contact and lastly the stair Foundation Actually not lastly the stair foundation and the trees must be removed to allow repair of the decay to the property this is this photograph this entire staircase has to come out so he can get to the property and fix it so this and lastly the reduced soil level may affect the set back and thats up to you to interpret whether or not the section is adequately depicted by the soil level to be considered is 17 or 18 inches lower than it currently sits and the also the inner permitted patio that was built there, there are to unrelated issues in that the soil fill that was the recent fill a f3 and the stair and stair foundation inflict additional sewer surcharge thats the first part of the presentation shall we move to the other one or stop and consider. No please go ahead. Okay. I need a moment here please excuse me. On the roof deck there are 5 issues for you to consider we have the same orientation for to particular dr
Guidelines noting the project sponsor is taking steps required by dbi to legalize and correct the rear deck and stairs to grade originally built almost thirty years ago the rear stairs proposed are loud as a permit obstruction within the planning code and the stairs are proposed to be legalized of the dr requester they ask you not take dr. Approve it that concludes my presentation. Dr requester our team has 10 mens. Thank you for your stamina can those be sdrntd im to take the rear stairs which is 48 and second will be the first one im picking up i paul cox a Civil Engineer and i represent the dr requester rear stair issue ill be bring to your attention the items and that 3 of which will require our considerations and mention two other items that are action items handled by the building inspection. Can you speak into the microphone. Its on one. Okay. Thank you. There you go. Go ahead. Can i precede first just to make sure were oriented correctly this was written by the consultant for m
Retaining wall a f sub 3 is about a foot deep if i move to the next item the height of the stair foundation as built is an additional cost of wood architecture contact and looking at mr. Shirz this geological it appears to be correct i need to correct the retaining wall on the righthand side there the Actual Foundation is lower than shown in mr. Shirz report and has redwood lap siding it causes decay user the response that is this photograph in our staff report if you look at the lower lefthand side youll see clearly the siding is buried in soil and its not just in that location behind the stairs it moves all the way to the back of the building heres not view of the back of the building and the property wall is buried in this a f sub 3 soil a recent fill this next photo which is not in our presentation this other retaining wall the lower portion at the Bank Property line so the bottom portion of the soil is decayed rotted out and so is the flying framing the gentleman needs to get to t
Has the doris messengers in there although their mentioned as a possible compromise it didnt seem looets at least i dont feel they have an impact for remove thats my motion to leave them in there. That motion has been second on commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore no commissioner johncks San Francisco commissioner fong and no. So moved, commissioners, that motion passes that passes 5 to 2 it places you on the next item at 2655 street those are requests for discretionary review although the addressed are the same there are on two separate this by the same person my recommendation we call them together and provide their time of totally of 10 minutes. For both the dr requester and the sponsor. Thats correct. Im not sure i understand that but. Are you the dr requester. Im representing them. Your representing the dr requester youll have 10 maintenance total. I have a power point overwhelming to be presenting. Good evening, commissioners David Lin