Right , though . Well be going to right, though . Well be going to those marches alive and the duchess of sussex, yes, again, has criticised the seemingly endless toxicity of social media, revealing she she was targeted with bullying and abuse while pregnant with archie and lilibet. But this show is lilibet. But this show is nothing without you and your views. Its not me. Its all about you, let me know your thoughts on all the stories well be discussing today or any you want to chat about. Basically, me on basically, email me on gbviews gbnews. Com, or message me on our socials at gb news. Really simple on the screen there. But first lets have a look at the News Headlines, shall we . With the lovely sophia i thanks, dawn. Good morning. Thanks, dawn. Good morning. Its 12 00 more than £32 million its12 00 more than £32 million has been spent policing gaza related protests in london. The met police, confirming the figure as it prepares for another day of demonstrations. Another day of d
States Supreme Court decision in mapp v. Ohio is the heart of tonights program. That decision, as you probably also know changed the way courts in this country exclude evidence or consider evidence obtained in violation of our Fourth Amendment rights. Before the decision in mapp, the remedy of excluding evidence was unpredictable at best. If a Police Officer enters or searches our home, our car, our purse, our cell phone, we expect that the judge will prohibit that evidence from being used in a prosecution against us. Motions to suppress evidence are now expected. Theyre common. Defense lawyers in the oj simpson murder trial moved to exclude both blood and hair evidence from the trial of that case. Counsel for ted kaczynski, better known as the unabomber moved to exclude evidence of an unexploded bomb, a journal in which mr. Kaczynski admitted almost 16 of his bombings, and even his manifesto, all found within a remote montana cabin. In both of those notorious cases, the motions to sup
States Supreme Court decision in mapp v. Ohio is the heart of tonights program. That decision, as you probably also know changed the way courts in this country exclude evidence or consider evidence obtained in violation of our Fourth Amendment rights. Before the decision in mapp, the remedy of excluding evidence was unpredictable at best. If a Police Officer enters or searches our home, our car, our purse, our cell phone, we expect that the judge will prohibit that evidence from being used in a prosecution against us. Motions to suppress evidence are now expected. Theyre common. Defense lawyers in the oj simpson murder trial moved to exclude both blood and hair evidence from the trial of that case. Counsel for ted kaczynski, better known as the unabomber moved to exclude evidence of an unexploded bomb, a journal in which mr. Kaczynski admitted almost 16 of his bombings, and even his manifesto, all found within a remote montana cabin. In both of those notorious cases, the motions to sup
States Supreme Court decision in mapp v. Ohio is the heart of tonights program. That decision, as you probably also know changed the way courts in this country exclude evidence or consider evidence obtained in violation of our Fourth Amendment rights. Before the decision in mapp, the remedy of excluding evidence was unpredictable at best. If a Police Officer enters or searches our home, our car, our purse, our cell phone, we expect that the judge will prohibit that evidence from being used in a prosecution against us. Motions to suppress evidence are now expected. Theyre common. Defense lawyers in the oj simpson murder trial moved to exclude both blood and hair evidence from the trial of that case. Counsel for ted kaczynski, better known as the unabomber moved to exclude evidence of an unexploded bomb, a journal in which mr. Kaczynski admitted almost 16 of his bombings, and even his manifesto, all found within a remote montana cabin. In both of those notorious cases, the motions to sup
States Supreme Court decision in mapp v. Ohio is the heart of tonights program. That decision, as you probably also know changed the way courts in this country exclude evidence or consider evidence obtained in violation of our Fourth Amendment rights. Before the decision in mapp, the remedy of excluding evidence was unpredictable at best. If a Police Officer enters or searches our home, our car, our purse, our cell phone, we expect that the judge will prohibit that evidence from being used in a prosecution against us. Motions to suppress evidence are now expected. Theyre common. Defense lawyers in the oj simpson murder trial moved to exclude both blood and hair evidence from the trial of that case. Counsel for ted kaczynski, better known as the unabomber moved to exclude evidence of an unexploded bomb, a journal in which mr. Kaczynski admitted almost 16 of his bombings, and even his manifesto, all found within a remote montana cabin. In both of those notorious cases, the motions to sup