in 2010, the world of archaeology was galvanized by the discovery in bulgaria of a relic whose date and dna are compatible with those of john the baptist. in oxford s archaeology lab, tom and georges wait for the results of this new test. as they work to build up a comprehensive date map of john the baptist s relics across europe, could this latest test match the individual from bulgaria? you can see, here s the actual date, between 661 and 770a.d. right. so that s much younger than john the baptist. it s not john the baptist. so it s not the same finger that we looked at in bulgaria. the result isn t surprising to me. there are many bones attributed to john the baptist. and they can t all be. in this particular case, using radiocarbon, we ve managed to
in 2010, the world of archaeology was galvanized by the discovery in bulgaria of a relic whose date and dna are compatible with those of john the baptist. in oxford s archaeology lab, tom and george wait for the results of this new test. as they work to build up a comprehensive date map of john the baptist s relics across europe, could this latest test match the individual from bulgaria? here s the actual date between 661 to 770 a.d. right. so that s much younger than john the baptist. it s not john the baptist. so it s not the same finger that we looked at in bulgaria. the result isn t surprising
in 2010, the world of archaeology was galvanized by the discovery in bulgaria of a relic whose date and dna are compatible with those of john the baptist. in oxford s archaeology lab, tom and george wait for the results of this new test. as they work to build up a comprehensive date map of john the baptist s relics across europe, could this latest test match the individual from bulgaria? here s the actual date between 661 to 770 a.d. right. so that s much younger than john the baptist. it s not john the baptist. so it s not the same finger that we looked at in bulgaria.
in 2010, the world of archaeology was galvanized by the discovery in bulgaria of a relic whose date and dna are compatible with those of john the baptist. in oxford s archaeology lab, tom and george wait for the results of this new test. as they work to build up a comprehensive date map of john the baptist s relics across europe, could this latest test match the individual from bulgaria? here s the actual date between 661 to 770 a.d. right. so that s much younger than john the baptist. it s not john the baptist. so it s not the same finger that we looked at in bulgaria. the result isn t surprising to me. there are many bones attributed
in 2010 the world of archaeology was galvanized by the discovery in bulgaria of a relic whose date and dna are compatible of those with john the baptist. in oxford s archaeology lab they wait for the results of the new test as they look to build up a comprehensive date map of relics across europe. could this latest test match the individual from bulgaria? here s the actual date. so that s much younger than john the baptist. it s not john the baptist so it s not the same finger that we looked at in bulgaria. the result isn t surprising to me. there s many bones attributed to john the baptist and they can t all be.