To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
On April 5, 2021, the Eleventh Circuit reversed a district court’s denial of a defendant’s motion to compel arbitration in a Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) lawsuit arising from a former Comcast customer’s re-application for services, holding that the FCRA claim related to a prior agreement that contained an arbitration provision. The case is noteworthy in that it involved a particularly sweeping arbitration provision applying broadly to
all disputes between the parties, even those arising after the services agreement was terminated that the Eleventh Circuit had not previously considered. The court ultimately did not reach the question of the provision’s enforceability, however, instead remanding the case to the district court to determine its enforceability in the first instance.
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
On April 21, 2021, the Second Appellate District of the Court of
Appeal of the State of California filed an unpublished opinion rejecting Uber s
attempt to enforce an arbitration provision that waived an
employee s right to bring a claim under the California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). This
statute authorizes aggrieved employees to file lawsuits
to recover civil penalties from employers for violations of the
California labor code.
The plaintiff, Jonathan Gregg, filed a lawsuit against Uber in
August 2018, alleging that the ride-share company willfully
misclassified him as an independent contractor rather than an
[author: Shiva Pedram]
On April 21, 2021, the Second Appellate District of the Court of Appeal of the State of California filed an unpublished opinion rejecting Uber’s attempt to enforce an arbitration provision that waived an employee’s right to bring a claim under the California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). This statute authorizes “aggrieved employees” to file lawsuits to recover civil penalties from employers for violations of the California labor code.
The plaintiff, Jonathan Gregg, filed a lawsuit against Uber in August 2018, alleging that the ride-share company “willfully misclassified him as an independent contractor rather than an employee,” which led to violations of California Wage Order 9-2001 and several other Labor Code provisions that triggered his rights under PAGA. In response to the suit, Uber filed a motion to compel arbitration under the Arbitration Provision of the “Technology Services Agreement,” which the plaintiff was required to sign
Uber Can’t Compel Arbitration of PAGA Claim According to California Court Friday, April 30, 2021
On April 21, 2021, the Second Appellate District of the Court of Appeal of the State of California filed an unpublished opinion rejecting Uber’s attempt to enforce an arbitration provision that waived an employee’s right to bring a claim under the California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). This statute authorizes “aggrieved employees” to file lawsuits to recover civil penalties from employers for violations of the California labor code.
The plaintiff, Jonathan Gregg, filed a lawsuit against Uber in August 2018, alleging that the ride-share company “willfully misclassified him as an independent contractor rather than an employee,” which led to violations of California Wage Order 9-2001 and several other Labor Code provisions that triggered his rights under PAGA. In response to the suit, Uber filed a motion to compel arbitration under the Arbitration Pr
In
Hearn v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that a FCRA claim arising nearly a year after the termination of a subscriber agreement was subject to the arbitration provision included in the terminated subscriber agreement. 2021 WL 1246263 (11th Cir. 2021). Hearn was a Comcast subscriber, subject to a subscriber agreement (the “2016 Subscriber Agreement”) from December 2016 until August 2017, when he terminated the Comcast services. In March 2019, Hearn contacted Comcast again about pricing for services
at the same Service Address. In connection with his request, Hearn alleged that Comcast initiated a credit inquiry without his permission or knowledge. Hearn filed a putative class action in the Northern District of Georgia alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.