can choose their gender and teaches them about so-called white privilege. you believe judges must consider critical race theory when deciding how to sentence criminal defendants. is it your personal hidden agenda to incorporate critical race theory into our legal system? those are rhetorical questions. the answers will come tomorrow. that s in the q & a. how do you want to see judge jackson deal with those questions? i want her to do what she did today, be herself. i mean, she has a record. she s the only nominee she actually, when she s confirmed, what s going to be amazing is that besides sotomayor, she ll be the only other justice that sat at the trial level. think about that, 672 opinions. she s the only person 572, who has ever done that.
q & a. the senate minority leader mitch mcconnell praised judge jackson for reaching what he called impressive heights in her career but questioned her judicial philosophy. so what does that tell you? they go back and forth on this judicial philosophy. some of them are so-called originalists, some are texturalists, some create as they go along. she has 573 written opinions. it isn t like we re grasping for straws. what could she possibly be thinking? she s decided these cases, written these opinions. on sentencing, 12,000 pages of transcripts about her thinking. if you want to know who she is, it is in writing. this is fourth time the judiciary committee has had the opportunity to review these things in detail. what do you say to those republicans already attacking judge jackson as being, quote,
new insight from the anonymous trump insider who wrote a book and op-ed documenting the trouble and inner workings of the white house. he or she said they plan to unmask eventually. they said, quote, i m not afraid to use my own name to excess concerns of the white house. they added president trump will hear from me in my own name before the 2020 election. so far the anonymous has only been identified as a senior official. neither cnn or reddit can offer the author. but they did confirm to josh campbell it was anonymous during the q & a. the author does admit they were wrong about one thing. they said, my original argument has been thoroughly debunked. in the new york times op-ed i
during a question-and-answer on reddit, he or she announced plans to unmask event venltually. the person said, quote, i m not afraid to use my own name, adding president trump will hear from me in my own name before the 2020 election. so far anonymous has only been identified as a senior official in the trump administration. reddit did not confirm the person s identity but the book agent confirmed to cnn s josh campbell it was, in fact, anonymous during the q & a. he said my original gurmt has been thoroughly debunked. in the new york times op-ed i suggested that the steady tate of top officials in the administration could ameliorate donald trump s lapses in judgment.