Economical district it creates both district and removes the lot areas and the intensity will be limit by the open space they voted unanimously to recommend approval and the modification to both nc t to apply the lot restrictions and the one Additional Planning Commission modifications for the fillmore street to rezone two properties nc one, two rto the recommend go administrations we are recommended at the hearing one speaker who seemed to be adverse to my change. In the fillmore because of the areas troubled history with the redevelopment history the questions were based on lot area and supervisor wiener express his support and the racked density controls the Committee Voted Unanimously to with a positive recommendation this weeks board of supervisors was scald for the commissioner richards i supported the rezone and theres a car wash there one acre its been sold and development there project sponsor will double the units from 3 avoiding to plus housing no Affordable Housing fees tha
And as specifically on shortterm rentals how are they energy to do this under needs to be a formal report with the city attorneys advise thank you. Commissioner commissioners, if theres nothing further well move on to item 8 review of the past events of the board of appeals and the Historic Preservation commission. Good evening aaron with the Planning Department staff this week at the Land Use Commission they heard two items one was the establishment of the fillmore commercial district and the other of the visa determining economical district it creates both district and removes the lot areas and the intensity will be limit by the open space they voted unanimously to recommend approval and the modification to both nc t to apply the lot restrictions and the one Additional Planning Commission modifications for the fillmore street to rezone two properties nc one, two rto the recommend go administrations we are recommended at the hearing one speaker who seemed to be adverse to my change. I
Both nc t to apply the lot restrictions and the one Additional Planning Commission modifications for the fillmore street to rezone two properties nc one, two rto the recommend go administrations we are recommended at the hearing one speaker who seemed to be adverse to my change. In the fillmore because of the areas troubled history with the redevelopment history the questions were based on lot area and supervisor wiener express his support and the racked density controls the Committee Voted Unanimously to with a positive recommendation this weeks board of supervisors was scald for the commissioner richards i supported the rezone and theres a car wash there one acre its been sold and development there project sponsor will double the units from 3 avoiding to plus housing no Affordable Housing fees that Large Development has to pay; is that correct. Nothing particular mr. To the ordinance no. A cynical person wow. Is where he a windfall Public Policy dictates there are impacts and that co
So, depending on a duty but that would be something to look into. You would investigate if they had a duty to disclose they had lost those documents . We would. Thats something you would investigate. We would. So you said emergency roarli relative to it depends, it depends on whether theres a problem with the fact that the commissioner at the irs knew in april and waited two months to tell us the American People and more importantly you. So youre going to investigate that aspect, as well, just like you would for a private citizen . All the issues relating to those emails will be wrapped up in the investigation that we do. Including delay . Including delay. So the delay, the fact that the commissioner at the Internal Revenue Service Delayed telling the congress, the American People, the fbi and the Justice Department is a matter that you are going to investigate . We are going do look into what the circumstances were around that, yes. Well, thats important. I would recognize the Ranking
Im not sure the Justice Department requested information or if the irs offered it. Im not sure how the idea when you get in the format you ask for, it sure likes like you asked for it. Im not sure of the actual idea providing that information to the Justice Department came up four years ago, but it was provided after the meeting. Im just reading your testimony. She indicated someone else would followup, but that did not occur. Why did not occur . I dont know. You dont know . Let me give you a reason why i think it might not have occurred. This corresponds, this meeting took place on may 8th 2013. Do you know what happened . Yes i do. What happened . She gave a speech and talk about the issue. Yes. She explained to the whole world the irs was caught with their hand in the cookie jar and were target targeting conservative groups. That is what a followup did not occur. Two days before the very lawyer who met with lois lerner and got that data base. Two days before she goes Public Meeting