something happened to people down there at that point. yes. so how concerned were you about your own safety? i was concerned a little bit. i was warned by some colleagues that something could happen. i felt this had to be done and i had to go. the problem is we didn t really know what we were even looking for. when andrews and his two colleagues landed in havana in april of 2017, the incidents were still classified. patients were told to not even discuss this with their own families. we had a van from the embassy pick us up and take us to the hotel. i get into the room and i looked around. i hadn t seen this before. between every set of rooms was a small door, was a service chase.
dr. paul andrews himself became a victim when he traveled to havana to investigate. this is a preview. when andrews and his two colleagues landed in havana in april of 2017, the incidents were still classified. patients were told to not even discuss this with their own families. we had a van from thefrom th embassy pick us up. between every set of room was a small bore and it was a service chase. it was unusual. did you think there was somebody in that space in. i don t know. this is that service chase, potentially large enough for a person to stand inside. i looked out the window. i was on a high floor and i saw nothing out there that concerned me. there was no other building a the a height that would have a
met somebody named dr. paul andrews a physician working for the cia. he was the first guy that started looking into this. first patient came in and he examined the patient and he himself decided to go to havana to learn more about what exactly happened and what happened to him with he got to havana was a remarkable unfolding of events. take a listen. when andrews and his two colleagues landed in havana in april of 2017, the incidents were still classified. patients were told not to even discuss this with their own families. we had a van from the embassy pick us up and take us to the hotel. i get into the room and i looked around. i hadn t seen this before. between every set of rooms was a small door and it was a service chase. it was unusual.
potential defenses. alan dershowitz, othernt lawyera i talked to tonight deeply concerned by the biden white house s involvement t. they didn t have to g be involved. the fbi could have gone to court trying to compel thisontr, instead, the fbi take the shortcut, goes to the guy who might have to run againstts donald trump in 2020 t four and gets the records through the backdoor. you know, i saw our colleague greg jarrett s column. n. they actually use garland s words against that.to it s u standard practice to use less intrusive means.ey and they also want to know in this filing filing today, f the fbi lie to the magistrate that they omit exculpatory information. there s got toul be at leasts 30 questions just based on those two observations in this filing today. as well, right? yeah, there s no doubt.s listen, there s so much we don t know. it s like march or april of 2017 when you and i we re working on the russian collusion story, we re going to learn a lot of factstssiing. ew but
house. it actually lead the pulitzer boards to open two separate independent investigations into the awarding of those prizes. this week, the pulitzer board announced the results of those investigations, and here is part of what they said. no passages or headlines, contentions or assertions in any of the winning submissions were discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the control of the prizes. the 2018 pulitzer prizes in national reporting stand. the pulitzer board stayed behind this succession of thoroughly reported stories detailing russia s interference in the 2016 campaign. trump and his campaign links to russia, his efforts to obstruct investigations into both. this was the headline in one of those award-winning pieces of reporting. it s from the new york times, dated in april of 2017. quote, comey trying to shield the fbi from politics.