just from the right wing perspective, i m seeing an imbalance between how legal scholars are are talking and how the pundits are are talking about this. what s that about? there actually is a huge difference from a legal perspective. this is where i put on my georgetown law school grad hat. it s a narrowly written decision. it was written for that specific purpose to hopefully hope that people will not go berserk in the application of the law. just because the decision was written narrowly doesn t mean when humans get involved that they won t go nuts in their application of the supreme court ruling. are conservatives happy because they think this is just the start and there is going to be more rulings like this? this is the story, i guess of the supreme court has been it starts with with a narrow ruling and then comes back and something big is repeelded,
ruling it is. how there is no slippery slope. it applies to isolated cases. then you listen to the rhetoric, the clips and you think this is the biggest decision in the history of the supreme court. just from the right wing perspective, i m seeing an imbalance between how legal scholars are are talking and how the pundits are are talking about this. what s that about? there actually is a huge difference from a legal perspective. this is where i put on my georgetown law school grad hat. it s a narrowly written decision. it was written for that specific purpose to hopefully hope that people will not go berserk in the application of the law. just because the decision was written narrowly doesn t mean when humans get involved that they won t go nuts in their application of the supreme court ruling. are conservatives happy because