Patients need Better Service than theyre receiving out there. Thank you thank you. Is there another speaker please step forward and. Good evening, commissioners. Thank you for allowing me to speak i first met greg shep a number of years ago we participated in Community Outreach in the Central District when he was working at opening an dispensary in that area as a teacher i unfortunately met people that needed medical cannabis so fast forward my present experience with medical cannabis is my 94yearold fatherinlaw who has a disease i find relieve from medical cannabis we dont receive an effect we get the medical relieve we found we expect a clean and professional well run dispensary and when greg shep was involved on ocean avenue our were met the environment was smokey and messy when the other person took over we stopped going. Theres no room for unprofessionalism when health is the issue. Greg shep is the epitomize of the honest medical cannabis provider its my understanding that greg s
Letter dlefr my compassion telling me things about what was going on and i knew there were lying they were calling me on the phone and barging me to be their patient and where i was before they didnt take care of me not only with that but your personal needs make you feel like our at home and everything like i said, i got letters saying things that were not true about the former people working there. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you any other speakers step forward please. Okay hello. My name is robert ricci guess the only point i was coming up here to make it seems like on the application that you have one person saying theyre the main party to the permit and the operations the collective it appears very evident and mr. Mendez will be involved and if you see fit when you hear thats the case and i still that wasnt what was represented in the first hearing i believe that needs to be take into account and at least clarified thats not been the case of whats been prepared but it seems like i
The only point i was coming up here to make it seems like on the application that you have one person saying theyre the main party to the permit and the operations the collective it appears very evident and mr. Mendez will be involved and if you see fit when you hear thats the case and i still that wasnt what was represented in the first hearing i believe that needs to be take into account and at least clarified thats not been the case of whats been prepared but it seems like it is the fact so you thank you is there any additional Public Comment . Hello, im larry blnt we are at washington, d. C. This is a staff pompom in the first world series the defense ramps city college is on the ocean and im here because i was asked to be at the Police Meeting theyve rescheduled that but the acts of love theyre here advocating for Us San Francisco sometimes, i feel like berkley colorado everyone has left us behind. You know, washington and cannabis is something we need and should be known for cann
Im sorry as a final note im going to say that hes sued the city before based on this board decision to deny him a permit to open a dispensary and this board is that it. This board decision was based on its not in the best interests of the community. Go ahead. I have a couple of questions is that the standard procedure if the permit is initialed or issued and theres language regarding no grow that it is a thirty days suspension. So what i mean is when this incident happened well talk about the first incident theyre not supposed to have the second level not a grow area so since theyve violated that is Health Department to give a thirty day suspension maybe the gentleman will know. Can you introduce. Im ryan its mapped that article 33 gives a few enforcement options so their sited to a hearing and the director choose to give a thirty days suspension. If the incident happens again, the order is a revocation then the other one was there was a loaded fiefrm was it combined. During the invest
Thank you any other speakers step forward please. Okay hello. My name is robert ricci guess the only point i was coming up here to make it seems like on the application that you have one person saying theyre the main party to the permit and the operations the collective it appears very evident and mr. Mendez will be involved and if you see fit when you hear thats the case and i still that wasnt what was represented in the first hearing i believe that needs to be take into account and at least clarified thats not been the case of whats been prepared but it seems like it is the fact so you thank you is there any additional Public Comment . Hello, im larry blnt we are at washington, d. C. This is a staff pompom in the first world series the defense ramps city college is on the ocean and im here because i was asked to be at the Police Meeting theyve rescheduled that but the acts of love theyre here advocating for Us San Francisco sometimes, i feel like berkley colorado everyone has left us