desire to make a drug class available for others does not establish standing to sue. this is the most significant abortion ruling from the supreme court since it overturned roe v. wade nearly 2 years ago. joining us now, nbc news washington correspondent outside the supreme court. nbc news senior legal correspondent, laura jarrett. what more does this ruling say? reporter: is a significant ruling. this willing says the drug, this drug continues to be accessible for women across the country who use medication warming as their form of abortion. we ve seen studies that show 63% of women use abortion medication for their means of accessing abortion care. this ruling was unanimous from the 673 conservative majority. the doctors and antiabortion groups here do not have standing. that is important because the same it is a merit to this case, they are saying the people who brought this case to have standing needed. during oral argument, there were hints this was the way the court
i thought i detected a hint of sarcasm. i think we ve seen already six different courts already reject president trump s argument. the district court level and the appellate court levels in these three cases have all rejected this theory that the president is immune from investigation and that his records cannot be obtained either by committees in congress or by the prosecutor in the manhattan assistant district attorney s office. i think his argument is a loser and it s going to be interesting to see what the supreme court does with this. i think it s actually an opportunity for the supreme court to send an important message about its independence by ruling against president trump as the law suggests that it should. i think it can send a strong message that will help with the court s legitimacy in this country. correct me if i m wrong. these speak to his finances, his private life, and his pre-presidential years, correct?
detected just a hint of sarcasm when you talked about the swift pace of the supreme court. yeah, sorry about that. perhaps giving us a response by june. i think we ve seen already six different courts already reject president trump s argument. the district court level and the appellate court levels in these three cases have all rejected this theory that the president is immune from investigation and that his records cannot be obtained either by committees in congress or by the prosecutor in the manhattan district attorney s office. i think his argument is a loser, and i think it s going to be really interesting to see what the supreme court does with this. i think it s actually an opportunity for the supreme court to send an important message about its independence by ruling against president trump as the law really strongly suggests that it should. i think it can send a strong message that will help with the court s legitimacy in this country. and correct me if i m wrong. none o
republican-appointed chief justice and the two trump appointees now on this court? i thought i detected a hint of sarcasm. i think we ve seen already six different courts already reject president trump s argument. the district court level and the appellate court levels in these three cases have all rejected this theory that the president is immune from investigation and that his records cannot be obtained either by committees in congress or by the prosecutor in the manhattan assistant district attorney s office. i think his argument is a loser and it s going to be interesting to see what the supreme court does with this. i think it s actually an opportunity for the supreme court to send an important message about its independence by ruling against president trump as the law suggests that it should. i think it can send a strong message that will help with the
better than anybody. i think because of donald trump and mitch mcconnell, every conservative should be proud of the direction that this court and not just this court because the untold story is what is happening at the circuit and appellate court levels as well. that s because of mitch mcconnell, the way he s been running the senate and prioritizing nominations. but i think there s no question in my mind one of the biggest legacies that donald trump will have as president is the reshaping of the judiciary towards strict constructionalists. people that use the constitution as a guide post. those two people, donald trump and mitch mcconnell are people that every conservative should remember the teamwork that they have displayed in getting this done. neil: it is remarkable. you don t have to be right or level to realize thou that 1-2 punch worked. they re odd bed fellows. i m not saying we should play felix or oscar, but it s worked in a weird way, it s worked. they both got frustrated