Also gives the impression to the public that theres no consequence to smoking in areas where smoking is not permitted. Tobacco is still the number one cause of preventable deaths in the united states, and the two major factors that have reduced smoking in San Francisco from about 20 to about 11. 9 from 190 to now are snoakfree laws and tobacco taxes and that would be the if we were to allow smoking in this facility. So the department of Public Health is asking the board to please uphold the 30 day suspension because the business knowingly and repeatedly violated the ordinance since the first meeting in june 2010. The Department Also is asking the board to help send a message to the public and Business Owners that smoking is not will not be allowed in prohibited areas. And the only way we can do that is by upholding the cease and desist order which includes removal of the smoking devices from the cafe. Thank you. Vice president fung ms. Young, two questions. One is the no employees i sa
Of the 2010 San Francisco building code. I sympathize with the fact that the owner was getting water in their house, and, you know, any of us would want to remedy that situation. My thoughts are that it would have been probably better had been would bei, and i, for glad to go out there and look at the situation, give them advice regarding waterproofing or what permits would be necessary. And its really unfortunate to see this structure that was taken down. So i leave it in your hands for decision on the penalty. Im available for any questions. How old . 198096 . Thats what was mentioned on the notice of violation. And some of the pictures in the materials yeah, i see them. Show or indicate that its an old structure. Okay. Vice president fung youll get a chance for rebuttal after the departments. Is there any Public Comment . Okay. Seeing none, then we can take rebuttal. Thank you. This is all very new to me, and i do currently have an architect thats working with me to come up with a s
So basically mr. Johnson failed to appear for numerous hearings after i called him and told him that he would have some municipal Code Violations. Only after a letter on may 10, informing mr. Johnson that he needed to appear or his application would not be processed, he did appear. I informed him at that time he was in violation of the Municipal Police codes. And id like to show you which codes those are. Ill put those on as well. First one is going to be just a section that says that he must complete a set of fingerprints by the Police Department for his application. The second one is the Municipal Police code 3004a which basically states within four year the day of the application has been submitted, there is no convictions of burglary, robbery, theft, receipt of stolen property, removal of stolen parts from vehicles and malicious to a vehicle. Also, on his application, he also neglected to list the arrests, which is also a violation of the permit. When you apply, if you can see righ